Angular Universal vs Topcoat

Overview

Topcoat

Stacks3

Followers13

Votes15

GitHub Stars4.2K

Forks368

Angular Universal

Stacks329

Followers413

Votes36

GitHub Stars99.2K

Forks26.7K

Angular Universal vs Topcoat: What are the differences?

Developers describe Angular Universal as "A technology that renders Angular applications on the server". It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive. On the other hand, Topcoat is detailed as "CSS for clean and fast web apps". TopCoat is made up of base controls, platform specific styles, themes and a build script to stitch them all together.

Angular Universal can be classified as a tool in the "JavaScript Framework Components" category, while Topcoat is grouped under "Front-End Frameworks".

Angular Universal and Topcoat are both open source tools. Angular Universal with 50.1K GitHub stars and 13.9K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Topcoat with 4.3K GitHub stars and 416 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Topcoat	Angular Universal
TopCoat is made up of base controls, platform specific styles, themes and a build script to stitch them all together.	It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.
Components Galore; Themeable;BEM Architecture;Even our font is open source;Icons how you want them;PSD included;Available via CDN	server-side rendering using the Angular CLI; renders more quickly
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.2K	GitHub Stars 99.2K
GitHub Forks 368	GitHub Forks 26.7K
Stacks 3	Stacks 329
Followers 13	Followers 413
Votes 15	Votes 36
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Backed by Adobe 3 Open source 2 Pretty 2 Themeable 1 BEM Architecture	Pros 7 Typescript 5 Complete Framework 5 Server rendering and code splitting 4 Same existing code base for both SPA and SSR 4 Static site generator
Integrations
No integrations available	.NET Core PHP

What are some alternatives to Topcoat, Angular Universal?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Angular Universal vs Topcoat