Angular Universal vs UDash

Overview

Angular Universal

Stacks329

Followers413

Votes36

GitHub Stars99.2K

Forks26.7K

UDash

Stacks1

Followers7

Votes11

GitHub Stars449

Forks37

Angular Universal vs UDash: What are the differences?

Angular Universal: A technology that renders Angular applications on the server. It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive; UDash: Scala and Scala.js Reactive Web Framework. A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.

Angular Universal can be classified as a tool in the "JavaScript Framework Components" category, while UDash is grouped under "Front-End Frameworks".

Angular Universal and UDash are both open source tools. It seems that Angular Universal with 50.1K GitHub stars and 13.9K forks on GitHub has more adoption than UDash with 350 GitHub stars and 28 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Angular Universal	UDash
It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.	A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.
server-side rendering using the Angular CLI; renders more quickly	Shared Scala code; Type-safe; Compiled to JavaScript; Reactive data bindings; UI components; CSS; i18n; Generator; Backend independent; Open Source; IDE support
Statistics
GitHub Stars 99.2K	GitHub Stars 449
GitHub Forks 26.7K	GitHub Forks 37
Stacks 329	Stacks 1
Followers 413	Followers 7
Votes 36	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Typescript 5 Complete Framework 5 Server rendering and code splitting 4 Same existing code base for both SPA and SSR 4 Static site generator	Pros 1 I18n 1 Generator 1 Backend independent 1 IDE support 1 Compiled to JS
Integrations
.NET Core PHP	Scala JavaScript jQuery Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to Angular Universal, UDash?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Angular Universal vs UDash