Angular 2 vs Ember.js

Overview

Ember.js

Stacks1.6K

Followers865

Votes775

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks4.2K

Angular

Stacks3.8K

Followers4.8K

Votes499

GitHub Stars99.2K

Forks26.7K

Angular 2 vs Ember.js: What are the differences?

Architecture: Angular 2 follows the component-based architecture where every element on the web page is considered a component, making it more organized and easier to maintain. On the other hand, Ember.js follows the Convention over Configuration (CoC) approach where developers need to follow specific conventions to build the application, making it less flexible but faster to set up.
Learning Curve: Angular 2 has a steeper learning curve compared to Ember.js due to its complex syntax and concepts such as RxJS and TypeScript. Ember.js, on the other hand, is known for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it a better choice for beginners or those looking for quick prototyping.
Community Support: Angular 2 has a larger community and a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools, providing better support for developers facing issues during development. Ember.js, while having a smaller community, has dedicated contributors who ensure continuous improvement and updates to the framework.
Flexibility: Angular 2 offers more flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility, allowing developers to fine-tune the application according to their requirements. Ember.js, although less flexible compared to Angular 2, provides a more opinionated structure that can speed up development by reducing decision-making processes.
Data Binding: Angular 2 uses two-way data binding by default, meaning changes in the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. Ember.js, on the other hand, uses one-way data binding by default, making it easier to trace data flow but might require more effort in updating the view when the model changes.
Performance: Angular 2 is known for its better performance in handling complex and dynamic web applications, thanks to its advanced features like Ahead-of-Time (AOT) compilation. Ember.js, while efficient in rendering templates and handling data, can sometimes struggle with performance when dealing with large-scale projects.

In Summary, Angular 2 and Ember.js differ in architecture, learning curve, community support, flexibility, data binding, and performance, making each suitable for different development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ember.js, Angular

neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k

Comments

Alexander

Dec 22, 2020

Review

The tools you mentioned are all backend focused frameworks. I will say, you can choose one of them as you may prefer (maybe Laravel and Django will be better since it's more organized than Node.js). But no matter what, if you will create a website builder application, today you'll need a frontend framework like Vue.js, React or Angular - or maybe Ember.js, Svelte and Meteor.

382k views382k

Comments

Dennis

CTO at Prepaid-Hoster

May 17, 2020

Decided

I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.

181k views181k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js	Angular
A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.	It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.
Creating web apps;Building UI	Progressive Web Apps; Native; Code Generation; Code Splitting
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.6K	GitHub Stars 99.2K
GitHub Forks 4.2K	GitHub Forks 26.7K
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 3.8K
Followers 865	Followers 4.8K
Votes 775	Votes 499
Pros & Cons
Pros 126 Elegant 97 Quick to develop 83 Great mvc 82 Great community 73 Great router Cons 2 Too much convention, too little configuration 2 Very little flexibility 1 Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful 1 Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps	Pros 109 It's a powerful framework 53 Straight-forward architecture 48 TypeScript 45 Great UI and Business Logic separation 40 Powerful, maintainable, fast Cons 9 Large overhead in file size and initialization time 9 Overcomplicated 2 CLI not open to other test and linting tools 2 Ugly code
Integrations
Node.js AngularJS Bootstrap	Bugsnag Firebase Sentry Socket.IO

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, Angular?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

Chaplin

Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Related Comparisons

Angular 2 vs Ember.js: What are the differences?

Architecture: Angular 2 follows the component-based architecture where every element on the web page is considered a component, making it more organized and easier to maintain. On the other hand, Ember.js follows the Convention over Configuration (CoC) approach where developers need to follow specific conventions to build the application, making it less flexible but faster to set up.
Learning Curve: Angular 2 has a steeper learning curve compared to Ember.js due to its complex syntax and concepts such as RxJS and TypeScript. Ember.js, on the other hand, is known for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it a better choice for beginners or those looking for quick prototyping.
Community Support: Angular 2 has a larger community and a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools, providing better support for developers facing issues during development. Ember.js, while having a smaller community, has dedicated contributors who ensure continuous improvement and updates to the framework.
Flexibility: Angular 2 offers more flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility, allowing developers to fine-tune the application according to their requirements. Ember.js, although less flexible compared to Angular 2, provides a more opinionated structure that can speed up development by reducing decision-making processes.
Data Binding: Angular 2 uses two-way data binding by default, meaning changes in the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. Ember.js, on the other hand, uses one-way data binding by default, making it easier to trace data flow but might require more effort in updating the view when the model changes.
Performance: Angular 2 is known for its better performance in handling complex and dynamic web applications, thanks to its advanced features like Ahead-of-Time (AOT) compilation. Ember.js, while efficient in rendering templates and handling data, can sometimes struggle with performance when dealing with large-scale projects.

In Summary, Angular 2 and Ember.js differ in architecture, learning curve, community support, flexibility, data binding, and performance, making each suitable for different development needs.

Angular 2 vs Ember.js

Overview