AngularJS vs Apache Flex

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Apache Flex

Stacks14

Followers14

Votes0

AngularJS vs Apache Flex: What are the differences?

AngularJS and Apache Flex are both popular frameworks used for web development. Despite having some similarities, there are key differences between the two that developers need to consider.

Architecture: AngularJS is a client-side framework based on the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, where the client-side code runs in the browser. On the other hand, Apache Flex is a rich internet application (RIA) framework that leverages Adobe Flash Player for rendering user interfaces.
Language: AngularJS uses JavaScript to develop interactive web applications, making it accessible to a larger developer community. In contrast, Apache Flex uses ActionScript, a programming language specific to the Flash platform, which requires developers to learn a new language.
Scalability: AngularJS is known for its scalability and flexibility, making it suitable for building complex single-page applications. Apache Flex, while powerful for creating rich multimedia applications, may not be as scalable for large projects due to its reliance on the Flash platform.
Community Support: AngularJS has a vast and active community that continuously contributes to its development and provides extensive support through forums, documentation, and tutorials. Apache Flex, on the other hand, has a smaller community due to its niche market and reliance on Adobe technology.
Compatibility: AngularJS is designed to work across different web browsers and platforms, ensuring broad compatibility. Apache Flex, being based on Flash Player, may face compatibility issues as some devices and browsers no longer support the Flash plugin.
Mobile Development: AngularJS offers better support for mobile development, with tools like Ionic for building cross-platform mobile applications. Apache Flex, while capable of creating mobile apps through Adobe AIR, is not as well-suited for mobile development compared to AngularJS.

In Summary, AngularJS and Apache Flex differ in architecture, language, scalability, community support, compatibility, and mobile development capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Apache Flex

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Apache Flex
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	It is a software development kit for the development and deployment of cross-platform rich Internet applications based on the Adobe Flash platform.
-	UI components; Buttons; Forms; Containers; Lists; Data grids
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 14
Followers 44.5K	Followers 14
Votes 5.3K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Learning Curve 2 Hard to learn	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	Bootstrap Ionic HTML5 CSS 3 .NET for Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Apache Flex?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

AngularJS vs Apache Flex: What are the differences?

AngularJS and Apache Flex are both popular frameworks used for web development. Despite having some similarities, there are key differences between the two that developers need to consider.

Architecture: AngularJS is a client-side framework based on the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, where the client-side code runs in the browser. On the other hand, Apache Flex is a rich internet application (RIA) framework that leverages Adobe Flash Player for rendering user interfaces.
Language: AngularJS uses JavaScript to develop interactive web applications, making it accessible to a larger developer community. In contrast, Apache Flex uses ActionScript, a programming language specific to the Flash platform, which requires developers to learn a new language.
Scalability: AngularJS is known for its scalability and flexibility, making it suitable for building complex single-page applications. Apache Flex, while powerful for creating rich multimedia applications, may not be as scalable for large projects due to its reliance on the Flash platform.
Community Support: AngularJS has a vast and active community that continuously contributes to its development and provides extensive support through forums, documentation, and tutorials. Apache Flex, on the other hand, has a smaller community due to its niche market and reliance on Adobe technology.
Compatibility: AngularJS is designed to work across different web browsers and platforms, ensuring broad compatibility. Apache Flex, being based on Flash Player, may face compatibility issues as some devices and browsers no longer support the Flash plugin.
Mobile Development: AngularJS offers better support for mobile development, with tools like Ionic for building cross-platform mobile applications. Apache Flex, while capable of creating mobile apps through Adobe AIR, is not as well-suited for mobile development compared to AngularJS.

In Summary, AngularJS and Apache Flex differ in architecture, language, scalability, community support, compatibility, and mobile development capabilities.