AngularJS vs Apache Wicket

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Apache Wicket

Stacks61

Followers54

Votes2

AngularJS vs Apache Wicket: What are the differences?

AngularJS and Apache Wicket are two popular web development frameworks. They have their own unique features and functionalities that distinguish them from each other.

Architecture: AngularJS follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, separating the application logic, presentation layer, and user input into distinct components. On the other hand, Apache Wicket follows the component-based architecture, where the UI components are defined in the Java code.
Language: AngularJS is primarily based on JavaScript, which allows for dynamic frontend development. In contrast, Apache Wicket is a Java-based framework, making it suitable for Java developers who are comfortable with server-side programming.
Data Binding: AngularJS utilizes two-way data binding, where changes in the model are instantly reflected in the view and vice versa. Apache Wicket, on the other hand, uses one-way data binding, making it more secure and easier to manage complex UI components.
Routing: AngularJS has built-in support for routing, allowing developers to create single-page applications with multiple views. Apache Wicket, however, requires additional plugins or configurations for implementing routing functionality.
Community and Support: AngularJS has a large and active community that regularly contributes to its development, providing extensive documentation and support. Although Apache Wicket also has a dedicated user base, it may not be as widespread or actively maintained as AngularJS.
Learning Curve: AngularJS is known for its steep learning curve due to its complex concepts like directives, services, and dependency injection. On the other hand, Apache Wicket offers a more straightforward learning curve, especially for Java developers familiar with object-oriented programming.

In Summary, AngularJS and Apache Wicket differ in their architecture, language, data binding, routing, community support, and learning curve, catering to developers with varied preferences and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Apache Wicket

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Apache Wicket
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.
-	Just Java & HTML;Secure by Default;AJAX Components;Open Source with Apache License;Maintainable code; JavaEE integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 61
Followers 44.5K	Followers 54
Votes 5.3K	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Learning Curve 2 Hard to learn	Pros 1 Component based 1 Java
Integrations
JavaScript	IntelliJ IDEA JavaScript HTML5 CSS 3 NetBeans IDE Java 8 Java EE Eclipse

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Apache Wicket?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Related Comparisons

AngularJS vs Apache Wicket: What are the differences?

AngularJS and Apache Wicket are two popular web development frameworks. They have their own unique features and functionalities that distinguish them from each other.

Architecture: AngularJS follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, separating the application logic, presentation layer, and user input into distinct components. On the other hand, Apache Wicket follows the component-based architecture, where the UI components are defined in the Java code.
Language: AngularJS is primarily based on JavaScript, which allows for dynamic frontend development. In contrast, Apache Wicket is a Java-based framework, making it suitable for Java developers who are comfortable with server-side programming.
Data Binding: AngularJS utilizes two-way data binding, where changes in the model are instantly reflected in the view and vice versa. Apache Wicket, on the other hand, uses one-way data binding, making it more secure and easier to manage complex UI components.
Routing: AngularJS has built-in support for routing, allowing developers to create single-page applications with multiple views. Apache Wicket, however, requires additional plugins or configurations for implementing routing functionality.
Community and Support: AngularJS has a large and active community that regularly contributes to its development, providing extensive documentation and support. Although Apache Wicket also has a dedicated user base, it may not be as widespread or actively maintained as AngularJS.
Learning Curve: AngularJS is known for its steep learning curve due to its complex concepts like directives, services, and dependency injection. On the other hand, Apache Wicket offers a more straightforward learning curve, especially for Java developers familiar with object-oriented programming.

AngularJS vs Apache Wicket

Overview