StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. AngularJS vs Blade

AngularJS vs Blade

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AngularJS
AngularJS
Stacks61.5K
Followers44.5K
Votes5.3K
GitHub Stars59.0K
Forks27.3K
Blade
Blade
Stacks50
Followers83
Votes0

AngularJS vs Blade: What are the differences?

Differences between AngularJS and Blade

AngularJS and Blade are two popular frameworks used for web development. While both serve the purpose of simplifying the development process, they have distinct differences that set them apart. Here are some key differences between AngularJS and Blade:

  1. Syntax and Templating: AngularJS uses a declarative syntax, which makes it easier to understand and write. It uses HTML as its templating language, allowing developers to create dynamic views without the need for manual DOM manipulation. Blade, on the other hand, uses a templating engine that is embedded in PHP. It uses a mix of PHP and Blade syntax to generate HTML, providing more flexibility but also requiring more manual coding.

  2. Client-side vs Server-side: AngularJS is a JavaScript-based framework that operates mainly on the client-side. It allows for the creation of Single-Page Applications (SPAs) where most of the processing happens on the client's browser. In contrast, Blade is a server-side templating engine that operates on the server. It generates HTML on the server and sends it to the client, making it suitable for traditional server-rendered applications.

  3. Data Binding: AngularJS includes two-way data binding out of the box. This means that changes made to the model are automatically reflected in the view, and vice versa. Blade, on the other hand, requires explicit data binding using PHP variables and control structures. This gives developers more control over how data is passed between the server and the view.

  4. Component-based Architecture: AngularJS follows a component-based architecture, where the development process is centered around reusable components. Components encapsulate both the UI and the logic, making it easier to manage and maintain the codebase. Blade, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for components. It relies on the more traditional model-view-controller (MVC) pattern, where the views are separate from the logic.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: AngularJS has a large and active community of developers, with a vast ecosystem of libraries, tools, and resources. It is backed by Google, which ensures its continuous development and support. Blade, on the other hand, is primarily used within the Laravel PHP framework. While Laravel also has a strong community, the Blade templating engine itself is not as widely adopted outside of the Laravel ecosystem.

  6. Learning Curve: AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Blade. This is primarily because AngularJS introduces concepts such as dependency injection and directives, which may be unfamiliar to developers coming from a traditional server-side development background. Blade, being an extension of PHP, is more familiar to PHP developers and requires less of a learning curve.

In summary, AngularJS and Blade have different approaches to web development. AngularJS is a client-side JavaScript framework that simplifies the development of SPAs, while Blade is a server-side templating engine that is embedded in PHP. They differ in terms of syntax, architecture, data binding, community support, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Blade

Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
John Clifford
John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k
Comments
José
José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS
AngularJS
Blade
Blade

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.

-
Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
27.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
61.5K
Stacks
50
Followers
44.5K
Followers
83
Votes
5.3K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 889
    Quick to develop
  • 589
    Great mvc
  • 573
    Powerful
  • 520
    Restful
  • 505
    Backed by google
Cons
  • 12
    Complex
  • 4
    Dependency injection
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Hard to learn
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Blade?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase