AngularJS vs Jinja2

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Jinja

Stacks2.3K

Followers292

Votes8

GitHub Stars11.2K

Forks1.7K

AngularJS vs Jinja2: What are the differences?

Key difference 1: Syntax and Templating - AngularJS uses its own syntax and templating system, which is based on HTML and includes various directives and expressions. On the other hand, Jinja2 is a templating engine for Python, which uses a different syntax and template structure. It allows embedding Python code within HTML-like templates.
Key difference 2: Client-Side vs Server-Side - AngularJS is primarily a client-side JavaScript framework that allows for dynamic and responsive web applications by manipulating the DOM directly. On the contrary, Jinja2 is a server-side templating engine that renders templates on the server before sending the final HTML to the client browser.
Key difference 3: Framework vs Templating Engine - AngularJS is a full-fledged framework that provides extensive features and functionalities for building complex web applications, including data binding, dependency injection, routing, and more. Jinja2, on the other hand, is a templating engine that focuses solely on the presentation layer and does not provide additional features for application development.
Key difference 4: Language and Usage - AngularJS is mainly used with JavaScript and is popular for creating single-page applications (SPAs). It requires the use of JavaScript to build components and handle application logic. Jinja2, on the other hand, is used with Python and is commonly used in web development frameworks, like Flask or Django, for rendering HTML templates with dynamic content.
Key difference 5: Learning Curve and Complexity - AngularJS has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive features and concepts, such as modules, components, services, and directives. It requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript along with its own framework-specific concepts. Comparatively, Jinja2 has a relatively simpler syntax, making it easier to learn and use, especially for Python developers.
Key difference 6: Context and Data Binding - AngularJS provides powerful two-way data binding, which means that changes in the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. It keeps the view and model in sync, allowing for seamless interaction. Jinja2, on the other hand, does not offer built-in data binding and requires manual passing of data from the backend to the frontend through template variables.

In Summary, AngularJS is a JavaScript-based framework primarily used for client-side development of dynamic web applications, while Jinja2 is a Python templating engine used for server-side rendering of HTML templates with embedded Python code.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Jinja

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Jinja
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.
-	Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars 11.2K
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks 1.7K
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 2.3K
Followers 44.5K	Followers 292
Votes 5.3K	Votes 8
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Learning Curve 2 Hard to learn	Pros 8 It is simple to use
Integrations
JavaScript	Ember.js Git JavaScript Python Node.js

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Jinja?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Related Comparisons

AngularJS vs Jinja2: What are the differences?

Key difference 1: Syntax and Templating - AngularJS uses its own syntax and templating system, which is based on HTML and includes various directives and expressions. On the other hand, Jinja2 is a templating engine for Python, which uses a different syntax and template structure. It allows embedding Python code within HTML-like templates.
Key difference 2: Client-Side vs Server-Side - AngularJS is primarily a client-side JavaScript framework that allows for dynamic and responsive web applications by manipulating the DOM directly. On the contrary, Jinja2 is a server-side templating engine that renders templates on the server before sending the final HTML to the client browser.
Key difference 3: Framework vs Templating Engine - AngularJS is a full-fledged framework that provides extensive features and functionalities for building complex web applications, including data binding, dependency injection, routing, and more. Jinja2, on the other hand, is a templating engine that focuses solely on the presentation layer and does not provide additional features for application development.
Key difference 4: Language and Usage - AngularJS is mainly used with JavaScript and is popular for creating single-page applications (SPAs). It requires the use of JavaScript to build components and handle application logic. Jinja2, on the other hand, is used with Python and is commonly used in web development frameworks, like Flask or Django, for rendering HTML templates with dynamic content.
Key difference 5: Learning Curve and Complexity - AngularJS has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive features and concepts, such as modules, components, services, and directives. It requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript along with its own framework-specific concepts. Comparatively, Jinja2 has a relatively simpler syntax, making it easier to learn and use, especially for Python developers.
Key difference 6: Context and Data Binding - AngularJS provides powerful two-way data binding, which means that changes in the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. It keeps the view and model in sync, allowing for seamless interaction. Jinja2, on the other hand, does not offer built-in data binding and requires manual passing of data from the backend to the frontend through template variables.

AngularJS vs Jinja2

Overview