StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. AngularJS vs Velocity.js

AngularJS vs Velocity.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AngularJS
AngularJS
Stacks61.5K
Followers44.5K
Votes5.3K
GitHub Stars59.0K
Forks27.3K
Velocity.js
Velocity.js
Stacks6
Followers26
Votes0
GitHub Stars17.3K
Forks1.5K

AngularJS vs Velocity.js: What are the differences?

AngularJS vs Velocity.js

Introduction:

AngularJS and Velocity.js are both popular web development frameworks used to enhance the functionality and aesthetics of websites. While they serve different purposes, it is important to understand the key differences between the two in order to determine which one is the right fit for a specific project.

  1. Usage:

AngularJS is a comprehensive JavaScript framework that is mainly used for building dynamic, single-page applications. It provides a robust structure for organizing and managing complex web applications.

Velocity.js, on the other hand, is a lightweight JavaScript animation library focused on creating smooth and performant animations. It allows developers to easily animate HTML elements using either CSS or JavaScript, making it a popular choice for adding visual effects to websites.

  1. Approach:

AngularJS follows a declarative approach, where developers define the desired outcome and let the framework handle the implementation details. It utilizes two-way data binding to automatically synchronize the data model with the user interface, simplifying the development process.

Velocity.js, on the other hand, follows an imperative approach, where developers manually specify how elements should animate. It gives developers fine-grained control over every aspect of the animation, allowing for more precise and customized effects.

  1. Learning Curve:

AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Velocity.js. Due to its comprehensive nature and complex concepts such as directives, services, and dependency injection, it requires a deeper understanding of the framework to effectively use it in projects.

Velocity.js, on the other hand, has a relatively easier learning curve. Its API is straightforward and intuitive, making it easier for developers to grasp and start animating elements quickly.

  1. Browser Support:

AngularJS has wider browser support compared to Velocity.js. It is compatible with all major web browsers, including older versions, providing a more consistent experience across different platforms.

Velocity.js, on the other hand, has relatively limited browser support. While it works well on modern browsers, including mobile devices, it may not be fully compatible with older or less popular browsers.

  1. Community and Documentation:

AngularJS has a larger and more active community compared to Velocity.js. This means that there are more resources available, such as tutorials, forums, and libraries, to help developers with their AngularJS projects.

Velocity.js, on the other hand, has a smaller community and fewer resources available. While it is still well-supported, developers may find it more challenging to find specific solutions or get help with any issues they encounter.

  1. Project Size:

AngularJS is suitable for larger and more complex projects. With its modular architecture and extensive features, it provides a scalable and maintainable solution for building enterprise-level applications.

Velocity.js, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller projects or specific animation needs within a larger application. It is lightweight and focuses solely on animations, making it a more lightweight and specialized solution.

In summary, AngularJS is a comprehensive framework for building dynamic web applications, while Velocity.js is a lightweight animation library focused on creating smooth and performant animations. AngularJS follows a declarative approach, has a steeper learning curve, wider browser support, larger community, and is suitable for larger projects. Velocity.js follows an imperative approach, has a simpler learning curve, limited browser support, smaller community, and is best suited for smaller animation needs within a larger project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Velocity.js

Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
John Clifford
John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k
Comments
José
José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS
AngularJS
Velocity.js
Velocity.js

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

It is an animation engine with the same API as jQuery's $.animate(). It works with and without jQuery. It is the best of jQuery and CSS transitions combined.

-
Color animation; Transforms; Loops; Easings; SVG support; Scrolling.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.0K
GitHub Stars
17.3K
GitHub Forks
27.3K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
61.5K
Stacks
6
Followers
44.5K
Followers
26
Votes
5.3K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 889
    Quick to develop
  • 589
    Great mvc
  • 573
    Powerful
  • 520
    Restful
  • 505
    Backed by google
Cons
  • 12
    Complex
  • 4
    Dependency injection
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Hard to learn
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Dojo
Dojo
layerJS
layerJS
ZingGrid
ZingGrid
fancybox
fancybox
DNN
DNN
Stencil
Stencil
Blazejs
Blazejs
Pilot
Pilot
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
UDash
UDash

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Velocity.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase