StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Log Management
  5. Apache Parquet vs Splunk

Apache Parquet vs Splunk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Splunk
Splunk
Stacks773
Followers1.0K
Votes20
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0

Apache Parquet vs Splunk: What are the differences?

Introduction Apache Parquet and Splunk are both popular technologies used for data storage and analysis. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. File Format: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage file format that is optimized for big data processing. It stores data in a highly compressed and efficient manner, allowing for fast query performance. On the other hand, Splunk is a software platform that allows for the storage, search, and analysis of machine-generated data. It uses its own data format optimized for real-time searches and indexing.

  2. Data Types: Apache Parquet supports a wide range of data types including primitive types, nested structures, and arrays. It also supports the definition and enforcement of schema, ensuring data integrity. Splunk, on the other hand, is more focused on unstructured and semi-structured data. It provides flexibility in handling different types of data, allowing for easy ingestion and indexing.

  3. Data Scalability: Apache Parquet is designed to handle large volumes of data and is widely used for big data processing in distributed systems. It supports parallel processing and can efficiently handle queries on massive datasets. Splunk, on the other hand, is optimized for real-time data indexing and searching. It is commonly used in log analysis and monitoring applications, where it can handle high-speed data ingestion and retrieval.

  4. Query Capabilities: Apache Parquet provides a highly optimized query execution engine that allows for efficient filtering and projection of data. It supports predicate pushdown and column pruning, reducing the amount of data that needs to be read from storage. Splunk, on the other hand, offers a rich query language and powerful search capabilities. It allows for real-time searches and enables the correlation of events across different data sources.

  5. Integration and Ecosystem: Apache Parquet is widely supported in the big data ecosystem and can be seamlessly integrated with tools like Apache Hadoop, Apache Spark, and Apache Hive. It provides connectors and APIs for various programming languages. Splunk, on the other hand, has its own ecosystem of apps and integrations. It provides APIs and SDKs for extending its functionality and integrating with other systems.

  6. Cost and Licensing: Apache Parquet is an open-source project released under the Apache License. It is free to use and has no licensing costs. Splunk, on the other hand, is a commercial product with different pricing options depending on the amount of data ingested and the features required.

In summary, Apache Parquet is a highly efficient and scalable columnar file format optimized for big data processing, while Splunk is a powerful software platform focused on real-time data indexing and search. The choice between the two depends on specific requirements, data types, query needs, and the desired ecosystem integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Splunk
Splunk
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

Predict and prevent problems with one unified monitoring experience; Streamline your entire security stack with Splunk as the nerve center; Detect, investigate and diagnose problems easily with end-to-end observability
Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
Statistics
Stacks
773
Stacks
97
Followers
1.0K
Followers
190
Votes
20
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Alert system based on custom query results
  • 3
    API for searching logs, running reports
  • 2
    Ability to style search results into reports
  • 2
    Query engine supports joining, aggregation, stats, etc
  • 2
    Dashboarding on any log contents
Cons
  • 1
    Splunk query language rich so lots to learn
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig

What are some alternatives to Splunk, Apache Parquet?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase