StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Caching
  4. Web Cache
  5. Apache Traffic Server vs Nuster

Apache Traffic Server vs Nuster

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Traffic Server
Apache Traffic Server
Stacks452
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.9K
Forks842
Nuster
Nuster
Stacks6
Followers29
Votes11
GitHub Stars1.9K
Forks154

Nuster vs Apache Traffic Server: What are the differences?

What is Nuster? A high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy. nuster is a high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy.

What is Apache Traffic Server? RFC compliant, high performance HTTP proxy cache. It is a fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0 compliant caching proxy server.Improve your response time, while reducing server load and bandwidth needs by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages, images, and web ser.

Nuster and Apache Traffic Server belong to "Web Cache" category of the tech stack.

Nuster is an open source tool with 1.46K GitHub stars and 106 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Nuster's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Traffic Server
Apache Traffic Server
Nuster
Nuster

It is a fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0 compliant caching proxy server.Improve your response time, while reducing server load and bandwidth needs by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages, images, and web ser

nuster is a high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy.

Open Source; Very Fast; High-performance; Extensible; ESI; Load Balancer; Caching
Web caching; Load balancing, NoSQL cache server
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.9K
GitHub Stars
1.9K
GitHub Forks
842
GitHub Forks
154
Stacks
452
Stacks
6
Followers
57
Followers
29
Votes
0
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Easy to configure
  • 1
    Web cache
  • 1
    Web application accelerator
  • 1
    Very Fast
  • 1
    High-performance
Integrations
CentOS
CentOS
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Alpine Linux
Alpine Linux
Fedora
Fedora
Debian
Debian
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Traffic Server, Nuster?

Varnish

Varnish

Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

Section

Section

Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge.

Squid

Squid

Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana