StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Apache Wicket vs Node.js

Apache Wicket vs Node.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Node.js
Node.js
Stacks200.4K
Followers164.5K
Votes8.5K
GitHub Stars114.1K
Forks33.7K
Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket
Stacks61
Followers54
Votes2

Apache Wicket vs Node.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Wicket and Node.js are two different frameworks used for web development with different approaches and features. Here are the key differences between Apache Wicket and Node.js:

  1. Server-Side MVC vs. JavaScript Runtime Environment: Apache Wicket is a Java-based framework that follows the server-side MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, where the rendering of the user interface happens on the server. On the other hand, Node.js is a runtime environment that runs JavaScript on the server-side, providing a non-blocking, event-driven architecture.

  2. Language: Apache Wicket is primarily used with Java, a strongly-typed object-oriented language, which provides security and robustness. In contrast, Node.js uses JavaScript, a dynamically typed language, which allows for faster development and ease of use with JSON-based APIs.

  3. Scalability: Apache Wicket utilizes the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and is known for its ability to handle large enterprise-scale applications. It benefits from the extensive JVM ecosystem, including features like garbage collection and memory management. Node.js, on the other hand, is designed to handle concurrent requests efficiently, making it ideal for applications that require high scalability and real-time, event-driven functionality.

  4. Frontend Development: Apache Wicket excels in server-side rendering of web pages, which involves generating the HTML on the server and sending it to the client. This approach provides better SEO (Search Engine Optimization) and initial page load performance. Node.js, on the contrary, focuses on client-side rendering, where the initial rendering of the web page occurs on the client using JavaScript frameworks like React or Angular.

  5. Package Management: Apache Wicket follows the standard Java package management system using Maven or Gradle, which allows for easy dependency management. Node.js, on the other hand, uses npm (Node Package Manager) as its primary package manager, providing a vast ecosystem of open-source packages that can enhance productivity and functionality.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Wicket has a dedicated community of Java developers with extensive enterprise-level support and a mature ecosystem of libraries and tools. Node.js, on the other hand, has a large and active community of JavaScript developers, providing a rich ecosystem of modules and frameworks specifically tailored for web development.

In summary, Apache Wicket is a server-side MVC framework primarily written in Java, known for its scalability and enterprise-level capabilities. Node.js, on the other hand, is a JavaScript runtime environment focused on event-driven, scalable web applications with a strong emphasis on client-side rendering and package management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Node.js, Apache Wicket

abderrahmane
abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k
Comments
Mohammad
Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsLaravelLaravelPHPPHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k
Comments
Zubair
Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL


Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

  • Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
  • Peer to peer Selling of used items
  • Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry
290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js
Node.js
Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.

-
Just Java & HTML;Secure by Default;AJAX Components;Open Source with Apache License;Maintainable code; JavaEE integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
114.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
200.4K
Stacks
61
Followers
164.5K
Followers
54
Votes
8.5K
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1439
    Npm
  • 1279
    Javascript
  • 1129
    Great libraries
  • 1012
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
Cons
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
Pros
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Component based
Integrations
No integrations available
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JavaScript
JavaScript
HTML5
HTML5
CSS 3
CSS 3
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
Java 8
Java 8
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Node.js, Apache Wicket?

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase