StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Apollo vs Relay

Apollo vs Relay

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Relay Framework
Relay Framework
Stacks214
Followers177
Votes1
GitHub Stars18.9K
Forks1.9K
Apollo
Apollo
Stacks2.7K
Followers1.8K
Votes25

Apollo vs Relay: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, Apollo and Relay are two popular frameworks used for managing data flow between the client and the server. Although they have similar purposes, there are several key differences between Apollo and Relay that developers should consider.

1. Apollo: Flexible, Customizable, and Supports Various Platforms Apollo is a feature-rich GraphQL client library that offers flexibility and customization. It can be used in a variety of platforms, including React, Angular, and Vue. Apollo allows developers to have more control over caching, state management and data fetching, making it easier to integrate with existing codebases.

2. Relay: Opinionated, Optimized for Performance, and Tight Integration Relay, on the other hand, is a GraphQL client library specifically designed for React applications. It follows a more opinionated approach and is highly optimized for performance. Relay provides a tight integration with React, using a specific set of patterns and best practices to ensure efficient rendering and data fetching.

3. Apollo: Standalone Library with Strong Community Support Apollo is a standalone library that can be used with any JavaScript framework. It has a strong and active community, which means there is extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support available. This can be beneficial for developers who want flexibility and support for different frameworks.

4. Relay: Automatic Data Fetching and Declarative Queries Relay excels in automatic data fetching and optimizes the process to minimize network requests. It utilizes a declarative approach where developers specify the data requirements upfront using GraphQL queries. Relay's compiler analyzes the query and generates the optimal code for fetching and updating the required data.

5. Apollo: Server-Agnostic and Easy to Set Up Apollo is not tied to any specific backend server implementation, making it server-agnostic. It can work with any GraphQL API or even RESTful APIs, providing a seamless experience for developers. Additionally, Apollo is relatively easy to set up, with fewer dependencies and a straightforward configuration process.

6. Relay: Strong Typing and Static Analysis One of Relay's strengths is its strong typing and static analysis capabilities. It enforces strict types for GraphQL schemas and queries, providing compile-time validation of queries against the schema. This ensures that any errors or mistakes in queries are caught early in the development process and helps maintain a high level of data integrity.

In Summary, Apollo offers flexibility, strong community support, and compatibility with various frameworks, while Relay focuses on performance optimization, automatic data fetching, and seamless integration with React. Developers should consider their specific needs and project requirements when choosing between the two.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Relay Framework
Relay Framework
Apollo
Apollo

Never again communicate with your data store using an imperative API. Simply declare your data requirements using GraphQL and let Relay figure out how and when to fetch your data.

Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.

Build data driven apps; Declarative style; Mutate data on the client and server
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
214
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
177
Followers
1.8K
Votes
1
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Relay Modern
Pros
  • 12
    From the creators of Meteor
  • 8
    Great documentation
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Real time if use subscription
Cons
  • 1
    Increase in complexity of implementing (subscription)
  • 1
    File upload is not supported
Integrations
No integrations available
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Relay Framework, Apollo?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase