Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Arch Linux vs Centos: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Arch Linux and CentOS
Arch Linux and CentOS are two popular Linux distributions that differ in several key aspects. Here are the main differences between the two:
Installation Process: Arch Linux follows a do-it-yourself approach where the user is required to manually configure and install each component, making it a more hands-on and customizable distribution. On the other hand, CentOS provides a more guided and automated installation process, catering to users who prefer a simpler setup.
Release Model: Arch Linux follows a rolling release model, which means that it provides the latest software versions and updates continuously. This allows users to have access to the most up-to-date features, but it also introduces potential compatibility issues. In contrast, CentOS follows a fixed release model, providing a more stable and reliable platform for enterprise environments.
Package Management: Arch Linux utilizes the Pacman package manager, which is known for its simplicity and efficient package management. It uses a rolling-release system, allowing users to stay updated with the latest software versions. CentOS, on the other hand, uses the YUM (Yellowdog Updater Modified) package manager, which is designed for stability and long-term support. It provides a more conservative approach to software updates.
Community Support: Arch Linux has a reputation for its active and passionate community that offers extensive online documentation, forums, and repositories. The Arch Linux community is known for its do-it-yourself ethos and encourages users to understand and tweak their systems. Meanwhile, CentOS benefits from a large community of enterprise users and provides reliable documentation, support forums, and expertise in setting up and managing server environments.
Software Stability: Due to its rolling release model, Arch Linux provides access to the latest software versions and features promptly. However, this may come at the cost of potential instability and compatibility issues. CentOS, as a fixed-release distribution, focuses on stability and long-term support. It is widely used in enterprise environments where reliability and predictability are crucial.
Target Audience: Arch Linux primarily targets experienced Linux users who prefer a more hands-on approach and desire maximum control over their system. It requires users to have a certain level of technical expertise to set up and maintain. On the other hand, CentOS caters to a broader range of users, including enterprise environments, system administrators, and beginners, providing a more user-friendly and preconfigured experience.
In summary, Arch Linux offers a more customizable and bleeding-edge Linux experience, suitable for experienced users who seek full control and the latest software updates. CentOS, on the other hand, focuses on stability, reliability, and long-term support, making it an excellent choice for enterprise environments and users who prefer a more user-friendly installation and management process.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Arch Linux
- Large Community17
- Package Manager15
- Customizable13
- Rolling Release12
- Arch User Repository11
- Bleeding Edge11
- Extensive Documentation10
- Arch Build System8
- X86_64 architecture supported7
- Can fix bugs yourself if you know how to4
Pros of CentOS
- Stable16
- Free to use9
- Reliable9
- Has epel packages6
- Good support6
- Great Community5
- I've moved from gentoo to centos2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Arch Linux
- Systemd only4
- Only X86_64 architecture is offically supported3
- No Guided Installation1
- System maintenance1
- Unstable1
- Comparatively fewer offically supported packages1
Cons of CentOS
- Yum is a horrible package manager1