Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Arch Linux vs Linux Kernel: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Arch Linux and Linux Kernel, highlighting the key differences between the two.
Development and Distribution Model: Arch Linux is a complete and independently developed Linux distribution created by its community, following a rolling release model. It revolves around simplicity, user-centric design, and full customization. On the other hand, the Linux Kernel is the core component of most Linux distributions, including Arch Linux, providing the essential interface between hardware and software. The Linux Kernel is developed collaboratively by many contributors worldwide, including Linus Torvalds as the main maintainer.
Scope and Functionality: Arch Linux is a full-fledged operating system that includes various packages and software choices from the Arch User Repository (AUR), emphasizing simplicity, minimalism, and user control. It provides a base installation with minimum software preinstalled, enabling users to personalize their system according to their needs. Conversely, the Linux Kernel is solely responsible for providing the core functionality of the operating system, including process management, hardware drivers, and system call interface, while relying on distributions like Arch Linux to provide additional software packages and user interfaces.
System Updates and Release Cycle: Arch Linux follows a rolling release model, which means that there are no fixed release versions. Instead, the users are continuously provided with updates and new package versions as soon as they are available upstream. This ensures that the latest software and security patches are readily accessible. On the other hand, the Linux Kernel follows a release cycle where major versions are released periodically. These major versions include new features, bug fixes, and improvements that are thoroughly tested and provided as stable releases. The Linux distributions then incorporate these stable kernel versions into their respective releases.
User Involvement and Customization: Arch Linux actively involves its users in the decision-making process and encourages active participation in the development and maintenance of the distribution. It provides a comprehensive and detailed documentation guide called ArchWiki, which helps users troubleshoot, configure, and modify their systems according to their preferences. In contrast, the Linux Kernel encourages contribution from developers around the globe who focus mainly on the core kernel development. It provides a platform for creating vendor-specific or architecture-specific patches, which can be submitted for consideration and possible inclusion in future kernel releases.
Installability and Pre-Configured Packages: Arch Linux provides a minimalistic approach during the installation process. The Arch Linux ISO provides a basic command-line environment that allows users to build their system from scratch, including choosing their desktop environment, packages, and software. This approach ensures a highly customized installation, but it requires a comprehensive understanding of Linux and the Arch Linux documentation. On the other hand, the Linux Kernel itself does not provide an installation mechanism or pre-configured packages. It is combined with other software components and user interfaces by Linux distributions like Arch Linux to create a complete operating system.
Target Audience and Complexity: Arch Linux is known for catering to technically inclined users who prefer full control over their system and enjoy tinkering with configurations and customizations. It is designed for users who are comfortable with command-line interfaces and appreciate the simplicity and flexibility it offers. Conversely, the Linux Kernel is an essential component of various Linux distributions, catering to a diverse audience, including both technical and non-technical users. The Linux Kernel aims to provide a stable, efficient, and reliable foundation for different distributions to build upon, regardless of the users' technical expertise.
In Summary, Arch Linux and Linux Kernel differ in their development and distribution model, scope and functionality, system updates and release cycle, user involvement and customization, installability and pre-configured packages, as well as their target audience and complexity.
Netdata introduces Linux eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) monitoring. With this enabled, monitor real-time metrics of Linux kernel functions and actions from the very same monitoring and troubleshooting dashboard used for watching entire systems, or even entire infrastructures.
This collector uses eBPF to monitor system calls inside your operating system’s kernel. For now, the main goal of this plugin is to monitor IO and process management on the host where it is running.
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Arch Linux
- Large Community17
- Package Manager15
- Customizable13
- Rolling Release12
- Arch User Repository11
- Bleeding Edge11
- Extensive Documentation10
- Arch Build System8
- X86_64 architecture supported7
- Can fix bugs yourself if you know how to4
Pros of Linux Kernel
- Sometimes you just have to write your own drivers1
- The best1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Arch Linux
- Systemd only4
- Only X86_64 architecture is offically supported3
- No Guided Installation1
- System maintenance1
- Unstable1
- Comparatively fewer offically supported packages1