StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Arch Linux vs Linux vs Ubuntu

Arch Linux vs Linux vs Ubuntu

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Arch Linux
Arch Linux
Stacks563
Followers555
Votes108
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Stacks80.4K
Followers59.1K
Votes468
Linux
Linux
Stacks3.1K
Followers2.5K
Votes46

Arch Linux vs Linux vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?

<Introduction> When comparing Arch Linux and Ubuntu, there are key differences that can influence your choice for your Linux-based system.

1. Package Management: Arch Linux uses a rolling-release system called Pacman, which provides the latest software versions quickly. Ubuntu, on the other hand, uses Apt package management with different release versions like LTS and non-LTS releases. This results in Arch Linux having a more bleeding-edge software collection compared to the stable and tested packages in Ubuntu.

2. Installation Process: Arch Linux has a minimalistic installation process, requiring users to manually configure every aspect of the system, making it more customizable. In contrast, Ubuntu offers a user-friendly installer with more automation, suitable for beginners or users looking for a quick and easy setup.

3. System Maintenance: Arch Linux demands more active system maintenance due to its rolling-release nature. Users need to frequently update their system and be knowledgeable about potential compatibility issues that might arise. Ubuntu, with its regular updates and LTS releases, offers a more stable and predictable environment that requires less interaction from the user.

4. Community Support and Documentation: Arch Linux has an active and knowledgeable community that provides extensive documentation and guides, catering to users who enjoy troubleshooting and hands-on learning. Ubuntu, with its large user base, also offers robust community support and well-documented resources, making it easier for beginners to find solutions to common issues.

5. Customization and Control: Arch Linux provides users with a minimal base system, allowing them to build a customized environment tailored to their needs. In contrast, Ubuntu comes with a pre-configured desktop environment, making it more suitable for users looking for a hassle-free out-of-the-box experience with less emphasis on customization.

6. System Resource Usage: Arch Linux is known for its lightweight and minimalistic design, making it ideal for older hardware or users looking to maximize system performance. Ubuntu, with its more feature-rich environment, tends to consume more system resources, making it better suited for modern hardware with higher specifications.

In Summary, when choosing between Arch Linux and Ubuntu, consider factors like package management preference, installation process complexity, system maintenance needs, community support, customization options, and system resource usage.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Arch Linux
Arch Linux
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Linux
Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

--
Portable(Multiplatform); Multitasking; Multi User; Multiprocessor SMP Support; Multithreading Support; Virtual Memory; Hierarchical File System; Graphical User Interface (X Window System)
Statistics
Stacks
563
Stacks
80.4K
Stacks
3.1K
Followers
555
Followers
59.1K
Followers
2.5K
Votes
108
Votes
468
Votes
46
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Large Community
  • 15
    Package Manager
  • 13
    Customizable
  • 12
    Rolling Release
  • 11
    Arch User Repository
Cons
  • 4
    Systemd only
  • 3
    Only X86_64 architecture is offically supported
  • 1
    Comparatively fewer offically supported packages
  • 1
    Unstable
  • 1
    No Guided Installation
Pros
  • 230
    Free to use
  • 96
    Easy setup for testing discord bot
  • 57
    Gateway Linux Distro
  • 54
    Simple interface
  • 9
    Don't need driver installation in most cases
Cons
  • 5
    Demanding system requirements
  • 4
    Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian
  • 2
    Snapd installed by default
  • 1
    Systemd
Pros
  • 19
    Open Source
  • 12
    Free
  • 9
    Reliability
  • 6
    Safe

What are some alternatives to Arch Linux, Ubuntu, Linux?

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

FreeBSD

FreeBSD

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

elementary OS

elementary OS

It is the flagship distribution to showcase the Pantheon desktop environment. The distribution promotes itself as a “fast, open, and privacy-respecting” replacement to macOS and Windows.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase