StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Argo vs Portworx

Argo vs Portworx

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portworx
Portworx
Stacks21
Followers58
Votes0
GitHub Stars271
Forks84
Argo
Argo
Stacks761
Followers470
Votes6

Argo vs Portworx: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between Argo and Portworx:

  1. Deployment Method: Argo is primarily used for workflow and pipeline management, allowing users to orchestrate tasks, while Portworx focuses on container storage services and data management. Argo is suitable for implementing complex workflows, whereas Portworx is more tailored towards handling persistent storage for containers.

  2. Resource Management: Argo enables users to define custom resources and manipulate them through the workflow engine, facilitating better resource utilization and allocation. On the other hand, Portworx places a strong emphasis on data resilience and replication, ensuring data availability and integrity even in the event of node failures.

  3. Integration Capabilities: Argo seamlessly integrates with Kubernetes, leveraging its API and architecture to automate tasks and streamline operations within the Kubernetes ecosystem. In contrast, Portworx integrates with various cloud platforms and storage solutions, offering compatibility with different infrastructure setups and environments.

  4. Multi-Cloud Support: Portworx offers multi-cloud support, enabling users to deploy and manage data across different cloud providers seamlessly. In contrast, Argo is more focused on workflow automation within Kubernetes clusters and does not provide native support for multi-cloud deployments.

  5. Monitoring and Logging: Portworx includes built-in monitoring and logging features, allowing users to track storage performance and troubleshoot issues efficiently. Argo, on the other hand, relies on external monitoring and logging tools for workflow execution insights and analysis.

  6. Scale and Performance: Portworx is designed to scale dynamically based on workload demands, ensuring optimal performance and efficiency for storage operations. Argo, while capable of orchestrating complex workflows, may experience limitations in scaling to accommodate large-scale deployments compared to Portworx.

In Summary, the key differences between Argo and Portworx lie in their primary functions, deployment methods, resource management capabilities, integration options, multi-cloud support, and performance characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portworx
Portworx
Argo
Argo

It is the cloud native storage company that enterprises depend on to reduce the cost and complexity of rapidly deploying containerized applications across multiple clouds and on-prem environments.

Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).

Data Mobility; Backup, recovery, migration made easy; High Availability; Scheduler-based Automation; Data Security; Anything, Anywhere.
DAG or Steps based declaration of workflows;Artifact support (S3, Artifactory, HTTP, Git, raw);Step level input & outputs (artifacts/parameters);Loops;Parameterization;Conditionals;Timeouts (step & workflow level);Retry (step & workflow level);Resubmit (memoized);Suspend & Resume;Cancellation;K8s resource orchestration;Exit Hooks (notifications, cleanup);Garbage collection of completed workflow;Scheduling (affinity/tolerations/node selectors);Volumes (ephemeral/existing);Parallelism limits;Daemoned steps;DinD (docker-in-docker);Script steps
Statistics
GitHub Stars
271
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
84
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
21
Stacks
761
Followers
58
Followers
470
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 2
    Autosinchronize the changes to deploy
  • 1
    Online service, no need to install anything
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Nomad
Nomad
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Mesosphere
Mesosphere
IBM DB2
IBM DB2
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Portworx, Argo?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot