StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Media Processing
  4. File Conversion
  5. Asciidoctor vs Pandoc

Asciidoctor vs Pandoc

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pandoc
Pandoc
Stacks279
Followers68
Votes3
GitHub Stars40.0K
Forks3.7K
Asciidoctor
Asciidoctor
Stacks154
Followers66
Votes2
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Asciidoctor vs Pandoc: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown is a lightweight markup language used for formatting text. It is widely used for creating content on websites, blogs, and other online platforms. In this task, the key differences between Asciidoctor and Pandoc, two commonly used tools for converting documents, will be highlighted in Markdown format.

  1. Syntax and Markup Language Support: Asciidoctor uses AsciiDoc markup language which provides more advanced features for document structuring, including support for footnotes, cross-references, and callouts. On the other hand, Pandoc supports a wide range of markup languages like Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, and others, giving users the flexibility to work with different syntaxes.

  2. Supported Output Formats: Asciidoctor primarily focuses on generating HTML output, while it also supports additional formats like PDF, EPUB, and DocBook. In contrast, Pandoc supports an extensive list of output formats including HTML, PDF, DOCX, ODT, EPUB, and many more, making it a versatile tool for converting documents into various formats.

  3. Extensions and Plugins: Asciidoctor offers a wide range of extensions and plugins to enhance its functionality. These extensions can be used to add custom features or modify the behavior of Asciidoctor. On the other hand, Pandoc has a modular design that allows users to extend its capabilities through filters, which are external programs that process the document before or after conversion.

  4. Customizability and Styling: Asciidoctor provides more control over the styling and layout of the output documents through its Theming and Styling mechanism. Users can easily customize the appearance of their documents using CSS. In comparison, Pandoc offers limited styling options, primarily applying basic formatting such as headings, lists, and emphasis.

  5. Maturity and Community Support: Asciidoctor has gained popularity in the Ruby community and has an active development community. It is widely used and has good community support in terms of documentation, plugins, and user forums. Meanwhile, Pandoc is a more mature tool with a larger user base and community support across multiple programming languages.

  6. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Asciidoctor has a steeper learning curve due to its powerful feature set and extensive documentation. Users may require some time to familiarize themselves with the AsciiDoc syntax and advanced features. On the other hand, Pandoc provides a simpler and more beginner-friendly experience with its straightforward syntax and intuitive command-line interface.

In summary, the key differences between Asciidoctor and Pandoc include their markup language support, output format variety, extensions/plugins availability, customizability/styling options, community support, and ease of use/learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pandoc
Pandoc
Asciidoctor
Asciidoctor

It is a free and open-source document converter, widely used as a writing tool and as a basis for publishing workflows. It converts files from one markup format into another. It can convert documents in (several dialects of) Markdown, reStructuredText, textile, HTML, DocBook, LaTeX, MediaWiki markup, TWiki and many more.

It is a fast, open source text processor and publishing toolchain for converting AsciiDoc content to HTML5, DocBook, PDF, and other formats. Asciidoctor is written in Ruby and runs on all major operating systems

Command-line tool; Supports OS X, Windows, Linux, Universal Document Converter
Lightweight markup language for authoring notes; Articles; Documentation; Books, web pages, slide decks and man pages in plain text.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
40.0K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
3.7K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
279
Stacks
154
Followers
68
Followers
66
Votes
3
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Markdown
  • 1
    More popular and active on github
Pros
  • 1
    Versatile
  • 1
    GitHub integration
  • 0
    Easy fornatting
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Java
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript
GitHub
GitHub
Ruby
Ruby
Gradle
Gradle
HTML5
HTML5
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
JRuby
JRuby

What are some alternatives to Pandoc, Asciidoctor?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase