StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ASP.NET Core vs Next.js

ASP.NET Core vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
Stacks11.0K
Followers2.7K
Votes1.6K

ASP.NET Core vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

ASP.NET Core and Next.js are both popular frameworks used for building web applications. While ASP.NET Core is a framework developed by Microsoft, Next.js is a framework built on top of React.js. Although they share some similarities, there are several key differences between ASP.NET Core and Next.js that set them apart from each other.

  1. Language: One of the main differences between ASP.NET Core and Next.js is the programming language they use. ASP.NET Core is primarily developed using C#, while Next.js utilizes JavaScript. This means that developers familiar with C# will find it easier to work with ASP.NET Core, while those proficient in JavaScript will prefer Next.js.

  2. Server-side Rendering: Next.js is specifically designed for server-side rendering (SSR), which means that the web page is rendered on the server before being sent to the client. This allows for faster initial page loads and better SEO. On the other hand, ASP.NET Core supports both server-side rendering and client-side rendering (CSR), giving developers more flexibility in choosing the rendering approach based on their project requirements.

  3. Ecosystem and Community: ASP.NET Core has a long-standing history and a well-established ecosystem, supported by Microsoft. It has a large community with extensive documentation, libraries, and tools available. Next.js, being built on top of React.js, also benefits from a strong ecosystem and community support. However, it may not be as extensive as the ASP.NET Core ecosystem due to its relatively newer development.

  4. Platform Independence: ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework that runs on various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to build applications that can be hosted on different platforms. Next.js, on the other hand, is primarily focused on building web applications and is not a cross-platform framework by itself. However, since it is built on top of React.js, React applications can be deployed on multiple platforms.

  5. Performance: When it comes to performance, ASP.NET Core is known for its speed and efficiency. It is highly optimized and leverages the full power of the underlying .NET framework. Next.js also performs well, especially in terms of initial page load and rendering. It utilizes server-side rendering and provides features like automatic code splitting and prefetching, resulting in fast and responsive web applications.

  6. Scalability: ASP.NET Core is designed to handle high-performance applications and can scale effectively to handle large workloads. It provides various scaling options, such as load balancing and clustering, to ensure application availability and performance. Next.js, being a framework built on top of React.js, can also scale well, especially when combined with serverless architectures and cloud platforms.

In summary, ASP.NET Core and Next.js have several key differences. ASP.NET Core uses C# as its primary programming language, supports both server-side rendering and client-side rendering, has a well-established ecosystem, runs on multiple platforms, and is known for its performance and scalability. Next.js, on the other hand, is built on top of React.js, focuses on server-side rendering, benefits from a strong JavaScript ecosystem, is primarily focused on web applications, and also provides good performance and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, ASP.NET Core

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Arman
Arman

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonReactReact

As a medium level .Net programmer trying to implementing a website, I decided to go through the Asp.Net Core. I found some tutorials on the web and started learning; however, I faced a problem. Even though I have been working with .Net and C# (mostly with unity game engine, which led to a quite amazing mobile game, published on a Persian app store) for two years or even more, by start learning Asp.Net Core, I found out that I do not know .Net as much as I expected. There were some things I should have learned before.

I searched for other frameworks, and Django was a popular one. Besides, I have planned to learn Python for machine learning. The website I want to make (with a small team) is nearly similar to Khan Academy. (We are going to use React for front-end)

So, What should I do? Continue working on .Net core with its amazing new features, or start getting into the Python and Django?

Your advice accompanied by reasons will be greatly appreciated!

424k views424k
Comments
Korawich
Korawich

Apr 7, 2020

Needs advice

I have a mission to make a web application for my organization (engineering consultant). With the following bullet points that the new web app has to cover, what is the right tool?

  1. It should be able to display employee data and project data. For example, when searching the name of Mr. Peter Parker, I should be able to click on the name to see his personal profile and also a list of construction projects he is or was a part of. Also, if I click on a project name, say Project ABC building, it should show me the detail of this project (who is the client, who works on this project, where, start-finish dates, etc.)

  2. It should be able to sync with the database from Microsoft Access.

(optional) 3. The user of this web app should be able to propose a rotation of role (Ex. Boss might want Mr. Peter Paker to work in another project next month, he can just drag Peter into XYZ Building.)

296k views296k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
11.0K
Followers
5.1K
Followers
2.7K
Votes
330
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 143
    C#
  • 118
    Performance
  • 96
    Open source
  • 90
    NuGet
  • 84
    Easy to learn and use
Cons
  • 5
    Great Doc
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Professionally written Nuget Packages, vs IMPORT junk
  • 2
    Clean
  • 1
    Long polling is difficult to implement
Integrations
React
React
Linux
Linux
Docker
Docker
macOS
macOS
NGINX
NGINX
.NET
.NET
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Windows
Windows
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Next.js, ASP.NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase