Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ASP.NET

28.1K
11.3K
+ 1
40
Classic ASP

75
75
+ 1
24
Add tool

ASP.NET vs Classic ASP: What are the differences?

Introduction

ASP.NET and Classic ASP are both web development frameworks used for building web applications. However, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Language Support: ASP.NET supports multiple programming languages such as C#, Visual Basic.Net, and F# whereas Classic ASP mainly uses VBScript as the scripting language. This allows developers to leverage their existing language skills when working with ASP.NET or choose the language that best suits their preferences.
  2. Performance: ASP.NET is known for its better performance compared to Classic ASP. This is mainly due to the fact that ASP.NET applications are compiled, whereas Classic ASP scripts are interpreted at runtime. The compiled nature of ASP.NET allows for faster execution and better memory management, resulting in improved performance and scalability.
  3. Object-Oriented Programming: ASP.NET is built on the Microsoft .NET framework, which is based on object-oriented programming principles. This allows developers to write code using object-oriented techniques, such as inheritance and encapsulation, which can make the code more modular, maintainable, and reusable. Classic ASP, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for object-oriented programming, making it less flexible in terms of code organization and reusability.
  4. Server-Side Controls: ASP.NET provides a rich set of server-side controls that encapsulate commonly used functionality, such as text boxes, buttons, and data grids. These controls provide a higher level of abstraction and make it easier to create interactive and dynamic web pages. Classic ASP, on the other hand, does not provide any built-in server-side controls, requiring developers to write custom code for handling user input and rendering output.
  5. Separation of Presentation and Logic: ASP.NET promotes a clear separation of presentation and logic through the use of a model-view-controller (MVC) architectural pattern. This allows developers to separate the user interface (view) from the application logic (controller) and the data (model), making the code more organized, maintainable, and testable. Classic ASP does not provide built-in support for this separation of concerns, making it more challenging to maintain and modify the code as the application grows in complexity.
  6. Error Handling: ASP.NET has a robust error handling mechanism that allows developers to handle exceptions and errors in a structured and centralized way. This makes it easier to detect and fix issues in the application. Classic ASP, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in error handling mechanism, requiring developers to implement their own error handling code, which can be error-prone and harder to maintain.

In summary, ASP.NET provides a more advanced and modern development framework compared to Classic ASP, offering better language support, performance, object-oriented programming capabilities, server-side controls, separation of presentation and logic, and error handling mechanisms.

Decisions about ASP.NET and Classic ASP
Christopher Wray
Web Developer at Soltech LLC · | 6 upvotes · 382.2K views

When I started on this project as the sole developer, I was new to web development and I was looking at all of the web frameworks available for the job. I had some experience with Ruby on Rails and I had looked into .net for a bit, but when I found Laravel, it felt like the best framework for me to get the product to market. What made me choose Laravel was the easy to read documentation and active community. Rails had great documentation, but lacked some features built in that I wanted out of the box, while .net had a ton of video documentation tutorials, but nothing as straightforward as Laravels. So far, I am happy with the decision I made, and looking forward to the website release!

See more
Alexander Krylkov
Sofrware Architect at Air Astana · | 2 upvotes · 209K views

Comparing to ASP.NET Core MVC or ASP.NET Core Web API Simplify.Web allows you to easily build your web-site or REST API without any additional/complicated setup, covering cases like localization by default. It's projects structure very lightweight, just a minimum amount of what you need to setup ASP.NET Core request pipeline.

It is build on top of Simplify.DI IOC container abstraction, no dependency on Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection and it's syntax. You can easily switch between DryIoc, SimpleInjector, CastleWindsor etc.

Any internal module of Simplify.Web can be easily replaced on extended by your custom module, covering your custom cases.

For HTML pages generation Simplify.Templates can be used allowing you to use just regular plain HTML without additional setup.

Can be easily integrated with Simplify.WindowsServices converting your web application not just to web-application, but a standalone windows service which can also do some background jobs via Simplify.WindowsServices.

And it is open source, of course :)

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of ASP.NET
Pros of Classic ASP
  • 21
    Great mvc
  • 13
    Easy to learn
  • 6
    C#
  • 5
    In real life faster than asp.net
  • 4
    All you need is a flat text editor as opposed to asp.ne
  • 4
    Easier to mix with html than php
  • 3
    Fairly good error reporting
  • 3
    Super easy to learn
  • 3
    Debug with IIS easily
  • 1
    Code and Debug in Visual Studio.Net IDE
  • 1
    Great if PHP won't work and you use a full IIS setup

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of ASP.NET
Cons of Classic ASP
  • 2
    Entity framework is very slow
  • 1
    C#
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers
  • 1
    No need to use MSQL
  • 1
    Link with any database JET or ODBC
  • 1
    No Session Server required
  • 1
    Low status in most it communities
  • 1
    Needs MS IIS and MS SQL ($$$)
  • 1
    You need to develop your own session server function

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is ASP.NET?

.NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.

What is Classic ASP?

It is a server-side scripting environment that you can use to create and run dynamic, interactive Web server applications. With ASP, you can combine HTML pages, script commands, and COM components to create interactive Web pages and powerful Web-based applications that are easy to develop and modify.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use ASP.NET?
What companies use Classic ASP?
See which teams inside your own company are using ASP.NET or Classic ASP.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with ASP.NET?
What tools integrate with Classic ASP?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to ASP.NET and Classic ASP?
ASP.NET Core
A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.
PHP
Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.
Django
Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
JavaScript
JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
See all alternatives