Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ASP.NET vs Classic ASP: What are the differences?
Introduction
ASP.NET and Classic ASP are both web development frameworks used for building web applications. However, there are key differences between the two.
- Language Support: ASP.NET supports multiple programming languages such as C#, Visual Basic.Net, and F# whereas Classic ASP mainly uses VBScript as the scripting language. This allows developers to leverage their existing language skills when working with ASP.NET or choose the language that best suits their preferences.
- Performance: ASP.NET is known for its better performance compared to Classic ASP. This is mainly due to the fact that ASP.NET applications are compiled, whereas Classic ASP scripts are interpreted at runtime. The compiled nature of ASP.NET allows for faster execution and better memory management, resulting in improved performance and scalability.
- Object-Oriented Programming: ASP.NET is built on the Microsoft .NET framework, which is based on object-oriented programming principles. This allows developers to write code using object-oriented techniques, such as inheritance and encapsulation, which can make the code more modular, maintainable, and reusable. Classic ASP, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for object-oriented programming, making it less flexible in terms of code organization and reusability.
- Server-Side Controls: ASP.NET provides a rich set of server-side controls that encapsulate commonly used functionality, such as text boxes, buttons, and data grids. These controls provide a higher level of abstraction and make it easier to create interactive and dynamic web pages. Classic ASP, on the other hand, does not provide any built-in server-side controls, requiring developers to write custom code for handling user input and rendering output.
- Separation of Presentation and Logic: ASP.NET promotes a clear separation of presentation and logic through the use of a model-view-controller (MVC) architectural pattern. This allows developers to separate the user interface (view) from the application logic (controller) and the data (model), making the code more organized, maintainable, and testable. Classic ASP does not provide built-in support for this separation of concerns, making it more challenging to maintain and modify the code as the application grows in complexity.
- Error Handling: ASP.NET has a robust error handling mechanism that allows developers to handle exceptions and errors in a structured and centralized way. This makes it easier to detect and fix issues in the application. Classic ASP, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in error handling mechanism, requiring developers to implement their own error handling code, which can be error-prone and harder to maintain.
In summary, ASP.NET provides a more advanced and modern development framework compared to Classic ASP, offering better language support, performance, object-oriented programming capabilities, server-side controls, separation of presentation and logic, and error handling mechanisms.
When I started on this project as the sole developer, I was new to web development and I was looking at all of the web frameworks available for the job. I had some experience with Ruby on Rails and I had looked into .net for a bit, but when I found Laravel, it felt like the best framework for me to get the product to market. What made me choose Laravel was the easy to read documentation and active community. Rails had great documentation, but lacked some features built in that I wanted out of the box, while .net had a ton of video documentation tutorials, but nothing as straightforward as Laravels. So far, I am happy with the decision I made, and looking forward to the website release!
Comparing to ASP.NET Core MVC or ASP.NET Core Web API Simplify.Web allows you to easily build your web-site or REST API without any additional/complicated setup, covering cases like localization by default. It's projects structure very lightweight, just a minimum amount of what you need to setup ASP.NET Core request pipeline.
It is build on top of Simplify.DI IOC container abstraction, no dependency on Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection and it's syntax. You can easily switch between DryIoc, SimpleInjector, CastleWindsor etc.
Any internal module of Simplify.Web can be easily replaced on extended by your custom module, covering your custom cases.
For HTML pages generation Simplify.Templates can be used allowing you to use just regular plain HTML without additional setup.
Can be easily integrated with Simplify.WindowsServices converting your web application not just to web-application, but a standalone windows service which can also do some background jobs via Simplify.WindowsServices.
And it is open source, of course :)
Pros of ASP.NET
- Great mvc21
- Easy to learn13
- C#6
Pros of Classic ASP
- In real life faster than asp.net5
- All you need is a flat text editor as opposed to asp.ne4
- Easier to mix with html than php4
- Fairly good error reporting3
- Super easy to learn3
- Debug with IIS easily3
- Code and Debug in Visual Studio.Net IDE1
- Great if PHP won't work and you use a full IIS setup1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ASP.NET
- Entity framework is very slow2
- C#1
- Not highly flexible for advance Developers1
Cons of Classic ASP
- No need to use MSQL1
- Link with any database JET or ODBC1
- No Session Server required1
- Low status in most it communities1
- Needs MS IIS and MS SQL ($$$)1
- You need to develop your own session server function1