StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. ASP.NET vs Scala

ASP.NET vs Scala

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Scala
Scala
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
GitHub Stars14.4K
Forks3.1K
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Stacks31.3K
Followers11.8K
Votes40

ASP.NET vs Scala: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between ASP.NET and Scala. Both ASP.NET and Scala are popular technologies used for web development, but they have fundamental differences in terms of programming language, framework, and ecosystem.

  1. Language and Syntax: ASP.NET uses languages like C# and Visual Basic.NET, while Scala is a statically typed programming language that runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). ASP.NET follows a C-style syntax, while Scala follows a mixture of functional and object-oriented programming paradigms.

  2. Platform: ASP.NET is a web application framework developed by Microsoft that is primarily used for building web-based applications, whereas Scala is a general-purpose programming language that can be used for a wide range of applications, including web development. Scala, with its integration with Java, provides access to a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools.

  3. Concurrency: Scala offers great support for concurrent programming with its built-in actor model implementation, compared to ASP.NET where concurrency has to be handled explicitly using multi-threading or asynchronous programming techniques. This makes Scala well-suited for building highly scalable and parallel applications.

  4. Interoperability and Integration: ASP.NET has seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies like SQL Server, SharePoint, and Azure services. On the other hand, Scala can easily interoperate with Java libraries and frameworks, leveraging the extensive Java ecosystem. It also integrates well with popular tools like Apache Spark and Kafka for big data processing.

  5. Community and Adoption: ASP.NET has a large community of developers and strong corporate support from Microsoft. Being a widely used technology, it has a mature ecosystem and plenty of learning resources. Scala, although not as popular as ASP.NET, has a growing community of developers and is favored by companies that are looking for highly performant and concurrent applications.

  6. Learning Curve and Ease of Use: ASP.NET, being a Microsoft technology, has a relatively low learning curve for developers who are already familiar with C# or Visual Basic.NET. It offers a rich set of development tools and intuitive APIs. Scala, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its unique syntax and functional programming concepts. However, once mastered, Scala provides powerful abstractions and expressive coding style.

In summary, ASP.NET and Scala differ in their programming languages, platform, concurrency support, interoperability, community, and learning curve. While ASP.NET is a popular choice for Windows-based web development with strong integration with Microsoft technologies, Scala offers a highly concurrent and scalable programming language that is interoperable with Java and well-suited for a wide range of applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Scala, ASP.NET

Christopher
Christopher

Web Developer at NurseryPeople

Mar 12, 2020

Decided

When I started on this project as the sole developer, I was new to web development and I was looking at all of the web frameworks available for the job. I had some experience with Ruby on Rails and I had looked into .net for a bit, but when I found Laravel, it felt like the best framework for me to get the product to market. What made me choose Laravel was the easy to read documentation and active community. Rails had great documentation, but lacked some features built in that I wanted out of the box, while .net had a ton of video documentation tutorials, but nothing as straightforward as Laravels. So far, I am happy with the decision I made, and looking forward to the website release!

424k views424k
Comments
Jakub
Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

We needed to incorporate Big Data Framework for data stream analysis, specifically Apache Spark / Apache Storm. The three options of languages were most suitable for the job - Python, Java, Scala.

The winner was Python for the top of the class, high-performance data analysis libraries (NumPy, Pandas) written in C, quick learning curve, quick prototyping allowance, and a great connection with other future tools for machine learning as Tensorflow.

The whole code was shorter & more readable which made it easier to develop and maintain.

290k views290k
Comments
i4004
i4004

Sofrware Architect at Air Astana

Feb 1, 2020

Decided

Comparing to ASP.NET Core MVC or ASP.NET Core Web API Simplify.Web allows you to easily build your web-site or REST API without any additional/complicated setup, covering cases like localization by default. It's projects structure very lightweight, just a minimum amount of what you need to setup ASP.NET Core request pipeline.

It is build on top of Simplify.DI IOC container abstraction, no dependency on Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection and it's syntax. You can easily switch between DryIoc, SimpleInjector, CastleWindsor etc.

Any internal module of Simplify.Web can be easily replaced on extended by your custom module, covering your custom cases.

For HTML pages generation Simplify.Templates can be used allowing you to use just regular plain HTML without additional setup.

Can be easily integrated with Simplify.WindowsServices converting your web application not just to web-application, but a standalone windows service which can also do some background jobs via Simplify.WindowsServices.

And it is open source, of course :)

234k views234k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Scala
Scala
ASP.NET
ASP.NET

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

.NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
31.3K
Followers
7.8K
Followers
11.8K
Votes
1.5K
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 188
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 175
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
Cons
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff
Pros
  • 21
    Great mvc
  • 13
    Easy to learn
  • 6
    C#
Cons
  • 2
    Entity framework is very slow
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers
  • 1
    C#
Integrations
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Scala, ASP.NET?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase