StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Authy vs Spring Security

Authy vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Authy
Authy
Stacks162
Followers174
Votes1
Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks559
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K

Authy vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

  1. Authentication Methodology Authy focuses on two-factor authentication and provides features like SMS, voice call, and token-based authentication. On the other hand, Spring Security is a comprehensive framework that offers various authentication mechanisms such as OAuth, OpenID, and SAML in addition to traditional username and password authentication.
  2. Integration Flexibility Authy is mainly focused on providing two-factor authentication services and can be integrated into any web or mobile application easily. Spring Security, on the other hand, is a full-fledged security framework that can be integrated with Spring-based applications seamlessly for managing authentication, authorization, and more.
  3. Customization Options Authy offers limited customization options in terms of branding and user experience for two-factor authentication. Whereas Spring Security provides extensive customization by allowing developers to define custom authentication providers, filters, and access control rules based on specific requirements.
  4. Scalability and Performance Authy's services are cloud-based which can offer good scalability and performance for handling authentication requests. Spring Security, being part of the Spring ecosystem, benefits from the scalability and performance improvements provided by the Spring framework for enterprise-level applications handling large volumes of users and requests.
  5. Community Support Authy has a dedicated support team for assisting with integration and troubleshooting two-factor authentication. Spring Security, being part of the larger Spring community, has a vast network of developers, forums, and resources for resolving issues and getting help with implementing security solutions.
  6. Ease of Use Authy is designed to be user-friendly for developers looking to implement two-factor authentication quickly and efficiently, with easy-to-understand documentation. Spring Security, while comprehensive, may have a steeper learning curve for developers due to its extensive feature set and configurations required for advanced security implementations.

In Summary, Authy is primarily focused on two-factor authentication with limited customization options and integration flexibility, while Spring Security is a comprehensive security framework with extensive customization options, scalability, community support, and complexity suitable for enterprise-level security implementations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Authy, Spring Security

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Authy
Authy
Spring Security
Spring Security

We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

Very secure- We take security seriously. We use industry standard secure algorithms (HMAC RFC 4426) and 256 bits keys which are always encrypted at rest.;Fully redundant- The Authy API is deployed accross different PCI level 1 data-centers and it's fully redundant. We also use a DNS provider with anycast support. We've had 100% availability since 2011.;Great user experience- You connect to Authy using a transparent REST API which allows you to customize the experience you want for your users.;Fully mobile- We support any cellphone. We provide apps for all major phones (iPhone and Android) as well as text-messages for other cellphones.;No expensive & complex setups- Hardware dongles, servers, software licenses, setup costs...It's 2013, forget all that. Authy is bringing two-factor authentication to the present.
Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
162
Stacks
559
Followers
174
Followers
589
Votes
1
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Google Authenticator-compatible
Cons
  • 2
    Terrible UI on mobile
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Java integration
Integrations
WordPress
WordPress
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC

What are some alternatives to Authy, Spring Security?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope