Autify vs Geb

Overview

Geb

Stacks19

Followers27

Votes0

Autify

Stacks12

Followers13

Votes13

Autify vs Geb: What are the differences?

< Write Introduction here >

Ease of Use: Autify is a low-code testing platform that allows users to create automated tests without the need for extensive coding, while Geb is a Groovy-based web automation testing framework that requires knowledge of the Groovy programming language to create tests.
Browser Support: Autify supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, while Geb primarily focuses on testing with the Chrome browser and has limited support for other browsers.
Cloud-Based Testing: Autify offers a cloud-based testing solution where tests can be run on remote servers, providing scalability and flexibility, whereas Geb is primarily intended for local testing environments without built-in cloud testing capabilities.
Visual Testing: Autify includes visual testing capabilities that allow users to verify the appearance of web pages during test execution, enabling the detection of visual regressions, while Geb lacks built-in visual testing features.
Integrations: Autify provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins and CircleCI, making it easier to incorporate automated testing into the software development pipeline, whereas Geb may require additional setup and configuration for seamless integration with CI/CD workflows.
Testing Capabilities: Autify offers AI-powered testing features that can optimize test flows and identify potential issues automatically, reducing the need for manual test maintenance, whereas Geb relies on manual test design and maintenance based on the script created by the user.

In Summary, Autify and Geb differ in terms of ease of use, browser support, cloud-based testing, visual testing, integrations, and testing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Geb	Autify
It brings together the power of WebDriver, the elegance of jQuery content selection, the robustness of Page Object modelling and the expressiveness of the Groovy language.It can be used for scripting	It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.
Groovy browser automation; Web Testing; Screen Scraping	No Coding Required; Maintenance by AI; Record a Test Scenario, Cross Browser Testing
Statistics
Stacks 19	Stacks 12
Followers 27	Followers 13
Votes 0	Votes 13
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 4 Easy to use 3 Works flexibly for an SPA 3 Simplify 3 Cross browser testing
Integrations
Apache Maven Java Gradle	Slack CircleCI Jenkins Testrail

What are some alternatives to Geb, Autify?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

Autify vs Geb: What are the differences?

< Write Introduction here >

Ease of Use: Autify is a low-code testing platform that allows users to create automated tests without the need for extensive coding, while Geb is a Groovy-based web automation testing framework that requires knowledge of the Groovy programming language to create tests.
Browser Support: Autify supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, while Geb primarily focuses on testing with the Chrome browser and has limited support for other browsers.
Cloud-Based Testing: Autify offers a cloud-based testing solution where tests can be run on remote servers, providing scalability and flexibility, whereas Geb is primarily intended for local testing environments without built-in cloud testing capabilities.
Visual Testing: Autify includes visual testing capabilities that allow users to verify the appearance of web pages during test execution, enabling the detection of visual regressions, while Geb lacks built-in visual testing features.
Integrations: Autify provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins and CircleCI, making it easier to incorporate automated testing into the software development pipeline, whereas Geb may require additional setup and configuration for seamless integration with CI/CD workflows.
Testing Capabilities: Autify offers AI-powered testing features that can optimize test flows and identify potential issues automatically, reducing the need for manual test maintenance, whereas Geb relies on manual test design and maintenance based on the script created by the user.

In Summary, Autify and Geb differ in terms of ease of use, browser support, cloud-based testing, visual testing, integrations, and testing capabilities.

Autify vs Geb

Overview