StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Autify vs Selenium

Autify vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
Autify
Autify
Stacks12
Followers13
Votes13

Autify vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Autify and Selenium, there are key differences that set these two automation testing tools apart.

  1. Programming Language Support: Autify is a codeless automation testing tool that does not require writing code, making it suitable for non-programmers. On the other hand, Selenium is a code-based tool that requires scripting in one of the supported programming languages such as Java, Python, C#, etc.

  2. Cross-Browser Testing: Autify provides built-in cross-browser testing capabilities, allowing users to easily test their applications across different web browsers without additional configuration. In contrast, Selenium requires setting up different browser drivers to perform cross-browser testing, making it more complex and time-consuming.

  3. Maintenance Effort: Autify's visual editor simplifies the test creation and maintenance process, as changes in the UI can be easily recorded without updating scripts manually. Whereas, Selenium scripts may become brittle due to UI changes, requiring frequent updates and maintenance.

  4. Cloud Testing: Autify offers cloud-based testing infrastructure, allowing users to run tests on various devices and browsers in parallel without the need for setting up local environments. Selenium, on the other hand, requires configuring and managing test environments on local machines or servers.

  5. Collaboration and Reporting: Autify provides collaboration features for team members to work together on test scripts and share test results efficiently. Selenium lacks built-in collaboration tools and reporting features, requiring additional integrations or plugins for these functionalities.

  6. Cost Structure: Autify offers a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on usage and features, making it easier to budget for automation testing. Selenium, being open-source, is free to use; however, the costs associated with maintaining test environments and resources may vary based on the organization's requirements.

In Summary, Autify stands out for its codeless nature, built-in cross-browser testing, simplified maintenance, cloud infrastructure, collaboration features, and flexible cost structure compared to Selenium.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, Autify

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
Autify
Autify

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.

-
No Coding Required; Maintenance by AI; Record a Test Scenario, Cross Browser Testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
12
Followers
12.6K
Followers
13
Votes
527
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Simplify
  • 3
    Works flexibly for an SPA
  • 3
    Cross browser testing
Integrations
No integrations available
Slack
Slack
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Testrail
Testrail

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Autify?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana