StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. AWS App Mesh vs Azure Service Fabric

AWS App Mesh vs Azure Service Fabric

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Stacks103
Followers284
Votes26
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks399
AWS App Mesh
AWS App Mesh
Stacks23
Followers205
Votes0

AWS App Mesh vs Azure Service Fabric: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS App Mesh and Azure Service Fabric

AWS App Mesh and Azure Service Fabric are two popular platforms used for building and managing modern applications. While both platforms offer similar functionality, there are some key differences between them.

  1. Deployment Model: AWS App Mesh is a fully managed service that handles application networking, while Azure Service Fabric provides a platform for building and deploying microservices-based applications. App Mesh focuses on abstracting the networking layer, while Service Fabric is a more comprehensive platform for managing the entire lifecycle of applications.

  2. Service Discovery: In AWS App Mesh, service discovery is handled by a service registry such as AWS Cloud Map or Amazon Route 53. On the other hand, Azure Service Fabric has built-in service discovery capabilities, allowing services to discover and communicate with each other without the need for external service registries.

  3. Integration with Container Orchestration: AWS App Mesh integrates seamlessly with popular container orchestration platforms like Amazon ECS and AWS Fargate. It provides native support for service meshes in a containerized environment. Azure Service Fabric also supports container orchestration but focuses more on its own container orchestrator, Azure Container Instances.

  4. Language Support: Both platforms support a wide range of programming languages, but Azure Service Fabric has a broader selection with support for languages such as C++, C#, Java, Node.js, and Python. AWS App Mesh primarily focuses on microservices and containerized applications and provides language-independent support.

  5. Managed vs. Self-managed: AWS App Mesh is a fully managed service, meaning AWS takes care of scaling, updates, and maintenance. In contrast, Azure Service Fabric provides options for both a managed service and a self-managed service. Users can choose to deploy and manage Service Fabric clusters themselves or leverage Azure's managed Service Fabric offering.

  6. Pricing Model: The pricing models for AWS App Mesh and Azure Service Fabric differ as well. App Mesh pricing is based on the number of requests made to the service and any additional data transfer costs. On the other hand, Azure Service Fabric pricing is based on the number and size of virtual machines used for running the Service Fabric clusters.

In summary, AWS App Mesh and Azure Service Fabric differ in their deployment models, service discovery approaches, integration with container orchestration platforms, language support, management options, and pricing models. These differences should be taken into consideration when choosing the platform that best fits the requirements of your application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Azure Service Fabric, AWS App Mesh

Mohammed
Mohammed

CTO at Famcare

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

One of our applications is currently migrating to AWS, and we need to make a decision between using AWS API Gateway with AWS App Mesh, or Kong API Gateway with Kuma.

Some people advise us to benefit from AWS managed services, while others raise the vendor lock issue. So, I need your advice on that, and if there is any other important factor rather than vendor locking that I must take into consideration.

38.8k views38.8k
Comments
lyc218
lyc218

Feb 21, 2020

Needs advice

Envoy proxy is widely adopted in many companies for service mesh proxy, but it utilizes BoringSSL by default. Red Hat OpenShift fork envoy branch with their own OpenSSL support, I wonder any other companies are also using envoy-openssl branch for compatibility? How about AWS App Mesh?

Any input would be much appreciated!

42.8k views42.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
AWS App Mesh
AWS App Mesh

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

AWS App Mesh is a service mesh based on the Envoy proxy that makes it easy to monitor and control containerized microservices. App Mesh standardizes how your microservices communicate, giving you end-to-end visibility and helping to ensure high-availability for your applications. App Mesh gives you consistent visibility and network traffic controls for every microservice in an application. You can use App Mesh with Amazon ECS (using the Amazon EC2 launch type), Amazon EKS, and Kubernetes on AWS.

Simplify microservices development and application lifecycle management; Reliably scale and orchestrate containers and microservices; Data-aware platform for low-latency, high-throughput workloads with stateful containers or microservices; Run anything – your choice of languages and programming models; Run anywhere – supports Windows/Linux in Azure, on-premises, or other clouds; Scales up to thousands of machines
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
399
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
103
Stacks
23
Followers
284
Followers
205
Votes
26
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Intelligent, fast, reliable
  • 4
    Runs most of Azure core services
  • 3
    More reliable than Kubernetes
  • 3
    Reliability
  • 3
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Envoy
Envoy
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service

What are some alternatives to Azure Service Fabric, AWS App Mesh?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana