StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. AWS App Mesh vs Ocelot

AWS App Mesh vs Ocelot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ocelot
Ocelot
Stacks83
Followers283
Votes4
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks1.7K
AWS App Mesh
AWS App Mesh
Stacks23
Followers205
Votes0

AWS App Mesh vs Ocelot: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Key differences in Architecture:

    • AWS App Mesh is a fully managed service that provides a control plane to manage and monitor the communication between different microservices within a containerized application. It uses Envoy proxies to route and manage traffic between services. On the other hand, Ocelot is an open-source API gateway that acts as a reverse proxy and provides a unified entry point for client requests, controlling and routing them to the appropriate microservices. Unlike App Mesh, Ocelot does not provide a comprehensive control plane or monitoring capabilities out of the box.
  2. 2. Support for container orchestration platforms:

    • AWS App Mesh is built to integrate seamlessly with container orchestration platforms like Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and AWS Fargate, providing deep integration and native support for Kubernetes APIs. Ocelot, on the other hand, is not tightly coupled with any specific container orchestration platform and can be used with various platforms like Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, and Service Fabric.
  3. 3. Protocol support:

    • AWS App Mesh supports a wide range of communication protocols, including HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and gRPC. This enables developers to use different communication patterns and take advantage of various performance optimizations offered by these protocols. Ocelot also supports these protocols, but it may require additional configuration and customization to enable and optimize support for specific protocols.
  4. 4. Monitoring and observability:

    • AWS App Mesh provides native integrations with AWS CloudWatch and AWS X-Ray, offering comprehensive monitoring and observability features. It allows developers to visualize and analyze the flow of traffic and performance metrics across microservices, enabling better troubleshooting and optimization. Ocelot, being an open-source library, does not provide built-in monitoring and observability features, but it can be integrated with external monitoring tools or custom solutions.
  5. 5. Scalability and elasticity:

    • AWS App Mesh is designed to automatically scale and handle high traffic loads by dynamically adjusting the resources allocated to the Envoy proxies. It can take advantage of autoscaling capabilities provided by the underlying container orchestration platform. Ocelot, being a library, relies on the scalability and elasticity features offered by the hosting environment, such as Kubernetes autoscaling or custom scaling solutions.
  6. 6. Vendor lock-in:

    • AWS App Mesh is a vendor-specific solution that is tightly integrated with other AWS services. This can result in potential vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to different cloud providers or use on-premises infrastructure. Ocelot, being an open-source library, offers more flexibility and avoids vendor lock-in as it can be used with different cloud providers or self-managed infrastructure.

In Summary, AWS App Mesh offers a fully managed service with comprehensive control plane, monitoring, and native integrations with AWS services, while Ocelot is an open-source API gateway that provides a unified entry point for microservices and can be used with different container orchestration platforms, but with limited built-in monitoring and observability features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ocelot, AWS App Mesh

Mohammed
Mohammed

CTO at Famcare

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

One of our applications is currently migrating to AWS, and we need to make a decision between using AWS API Gateway with AWS App Mesh, or Kong API Gateway with Kuma.

Some people advise us to benefit from AWS managed services, while others raise the vendor lock issue. So, I need your advice on that, and if there is any other important factor rather than vendor locking that I must take into consideration.

38.8k views38.8k
Comments
lyc218
lyc218

Feb 21, 2020

Needs advice

Envoy proxy is widely adopted in many companies for service mesh proxy, but it utilizes BoringSSL by default. Red Hat OpenShift fork envoy branch with their own OpenSSL support, I wonder any other companies are also using envoy-openssl branch for compatibility? How about AWS App Mesh?

Any input would be much appreciated!

42.8k views42.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ocelot
Ocelot
AWS App Mesh
AWS App Mesh

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

AWS App Mesh is a service mesh based on the Envoy proxy that makes it easy to monitor and control containerized microservices. App Mesh standardizes how your microservices communicate, giving you end-to-end visibility and helping to ensure high-availability for your applications. App Mesh gives you consistent visibility and network traffic controls for every microservice in an application. You can use App Mesh with Amazon ECS (using the Amazon EC2 launch type), Amazon EKS, and Kubernetes on AWS.

Routing; Request Aggregation; Service Discovery with Consul & Eureka; Service Fabric; Kubernetes; WebSockets; Authentication; Authorisation; Rate Limiting; Caching
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
83
Stacks
23
Followers
283
Followers
205
Votes
4
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Straightforward documentation
  • 2
    Simple configuration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GraphQL
GraphQL
.NET
.NET
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Envoy
Envoy
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service

What are some alternatives to Ocelot, AWS App Mesh?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana