StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Batch vs AWS Fargate

AWS Batch vs AWS Fargate

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Stacks84
Followers251
Votes6
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
Stacks650
Followers413
Votes0

AWS Batch vs AWS Fargate: What are the differences?

AWS Batch and AWS Fargate are both container-based solutions on AWS. Let's explore the key differences between them:

  1. Deployment Model: AWS Batch is a fully managed service that lets you run batch computing workloads while AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers. With AWS Batch, you specify the compute resources needed for your batch jobs, while with AWS Fargate, you just need to define your containers and let AWS take care of managing the underlying infrastructure for you.

  2. Scalability: AWS Batch enables you to automatically scale your compute resources based on the needs of your batch jobs. It provides dynamic scaling and takes care of efficiently distributing workloads. On the other hand, AWS Fargate automatically scales your containers based on the resource requirements specified in your task definitions. It allows you to run multiple container instances across multiple Availability Zones to handle increased traffic or workload.

  3. Resource Management: AWS Batch allows you to manage your compute resources by creating compute environments and managing job queues. You have more control over the allocation and utilization of resources. AWS Fargate, on the other hand, abstracts away the need for managing compute resources. You simply define your containers and let AWS Fargate handle the allocation and scaling for you.

  4. Cost Structure: AWS Batch offers a pricing model based on the compute resources used and the duration of the job. You have more control over the costs by choosing the type and size of instances to use. AWS Fargate, however, operates on a pay-as-you-go model, where you only pay for the resources consumed by your containers. It is more cost-effective for short-lived and variable workloads.

  5. Integration with other AWS Services: AWS Batch integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Auto Scaling, Elastic Load Balancing, and CloudWatch. You can easily configure these services to enhance the scalability and monitoring of your batch jobs. AWS Fargate also integrates with various AWS services, but it provides a more simplified and managed experience, allowing you to focus more on your application development rather than infrastructure management.

  6. Container Management: AWS Batch provides extensive support for container management by supporting various containerization technologies like Docker. You can easily package your batch jobs in containers and manage them using AWS Batch. AWS Fargate, on the other hand, is specifically designed for managing and running containers, providing a more streamlined and simplified experience.

In summary, AWS Batch is designed for batch processing workloads, offering control over compute resources and job scheduling, suitable for scenarios like data processing pipelines. AWS Fargate, on the other hand, abstracts away infrastructure management, making it ideal for running individual containers without the need to manage clusters, suitable for microservices and containerized applications with a serverless approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Batch
AWS Batch
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

AWS Fargate is a technology for Amazon ECS and EKS* that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters. With AWS Fargate, you no longer have to provision, configure, and scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers.

-
No clusters to manage; seamless scaling; Integrated with Amazon ECS and EKS
Statistics
Stacks
84
Stacks
650
Followers
251
Followers
413
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Containerized
  • 3
    Scalable
Cons
  • 3
    More overhead than lambda
  • 1
    Image management
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
AWS IAM
AWS IAM
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC

What are some alternatives to AWS Batch, AWS Fargate?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot