Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2 Container Service: What are the differences?
AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Container Service are two popular container management services provided by Amazon Web Services. The key differences between AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Container Service are:
Serverless vs. Server-Based Deployment: AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that allows users to run containers without having to manage the underlying infrastructure, while Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) requires users to provision, configure, and scale EC2 instances to run containers.
Pricing Model: AWS Fargate uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users pay for the vCPU and memory resources used by their containers, while Amazon ECS allows users to choose between on-demand EC2 instances, reserved EC2 instances, or spot instances, with pricing varying based on the instance type and usage.
Scaling Capability: AWS Fargate offers auto-scaling capabilities that automatically adjust the resources allocated to containers based on demand, while Amazon ECS requires users to configure and manage scaling policies to adjust the number of EC2 instances or containers running based on workload requirements.
Integration with AWS Lambda: AWS Fargate seamlessly integrates with AWS Lambda, allowing users to easily switch between running containers and serverless functions, whereas Amazon ECS does not offer direct integration with AWS Lambda.
Resource Isolation: AWS Fargate provides stronger resource isolation for containers by running each container in its own kernel-protected environment, while Amazon ECS relies on EC2 instances for resource isolation, which may offer slightly less isolation compared to Fargate.
In Summary, the key differences between AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Container Service include serverless vs. server-based deployment, pricing model, scaling capability, integration with AWS Lambda, and resource isolation.
If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes. EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.
Pros of Amazon EC2 Container Service
- Backed by amazon100
- Familiar to ec272
- Cluster based53
- Simple API42
- Iam roles26
- Scheduler7
- Cluster management7
- Programmatic Control7
- Container-enabled applications4
- Socker support4
- No additional cost2
- Easy to use and cheap1
Pros of AWS Fargate
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon EC2 Container Service
Cons of AWS Fargate
- Expensive2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Amazon EC2 Container Service?
What is AWS Fargate?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use AWS Fargate?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Amazon EC2 Container Service?
What tools integrate with AWS Fargate?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+22
+23