StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Task Scheduling
  4. Cloud Task Management
  5. AWS Batch vs AWS Step Functions

AWS Batch vs AWS Step Functions

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Step Functions
AWS Step Functions
Stacks237
Followers391
Votes31
AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Stacks84
Followers251
Votes6

AWS Batch vs AWS Step Functions: What are the differences?

AWS Batch automates batch computing, while AWS Step Functions coordinates distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Execution Model: AWS Batch is a fully managed service that enables you to run batch computing workloads, while AWS Step functions provide a serverless workflow service to coordinate distributed applications. AWS Batch focuses on managed batch processing and scheduling, while AWS Step Functions provide a flexible way to coordinate and manage various services in a workflow.

  2. Task Scheduling: AWS Batch allows you to schedule individual batch jobs or multi-step workflows using job queues, job definitions, and compute environments, allowing for fine-grained control over job execution. On the other hand, AWS Step Functions provide a visual, low-code way to define and orchestrate complex workflows, allowing for easy integration with various AWS services and custom logic.

  3. Built-in Job Monitoring: AWS Batch provides built-in job monitoring and logging features to track the progress and status of your jobs, allowing you to easily diagnose and troubleshoot any issues. AWS Step Functions also provide monitoring and logging capabilities, but they are more focused on the overall workflow execution rather than the individual tasks or jobs within the workflow.

  4. Retry and Error Handling: AWS Batch allows you to specify maximum retry attempts and define custom retry strategies for individual jobs, ensuring reliable job execution. AWS Step Functions provide built-in error handling and retry mechanisms, allowing you to handle failures and exceptions gracefully within the workflow.

  5. Integration with Services: AWS Batch integrates well with other AWS services like Amazon S3, Amazon DynamoDB, and AWS Lambda, allowing for seamless data transfer and processing between different services. AWS Step Functions also integrate with various AWS services, but their focus is more on coordinating and orchestrating the flow of data and tasks between these services.

  6. Cost Estimation: AWS Batch provides detailed cost estimation and forecasting tools that help you optimize your batch workload costs by analyzing resource utilization and scheduling. AWS Step Functions do not provide specific cost estimation tools, as their pricing is based on the number of state transitions and the execution time of the workflow.

In summary, AWS Batch is focused on managed batch processing and scheduling, while AWS Step Functions provide a serverless workflow service to coordinate distributed applications, with differences including execution model, task scheduling, monitoring, retry mechanisms, integration with services, and cost estimation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Step Functions
AWS Step Functions
AWS Batch
AWS Batch

AWS Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the components of distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Building applications from individual components that each perform a discrete function lets you scale and change applications quickly.

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Statistics
Stacks
237
Stacks
84
Followers
391
Followers
251
Votes
31
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Integration with other services
  • 5
    Complex workflows
  • 5
    Pricing
  • 5
    Easily Accessible via AWS Console
  • 3
    Workflow Processing
Pros
  • 3
    Containerized
  • 3
    Scalable
Cons
  • 3
    More overhead than lambda
  • 1
    Image management

What are some alternatives to AWS Step Functions, AWS Batch?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase