StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Infrastructure Build Tools
  5. AWS CloudFormation vs GitLab

AWS CloudFormation vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.3K
Votes88
GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

AWS CloudFormation vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will explore the key differences between AWS CloudFormation and GitLab, two popular tools used in the development and deployment of applications. Both tools provide ways to automate infrastructure management, but they have different features and functionalities.

  1. AWS CloudFormation: AWS CloudFormation is a service provided by Amazon Web Services that allows users to define and provision infrastructure resources in a declarative manner. CloudFormation uses templates written in JSON or YAML to describe the desired state of the infrastructure. It supports a wide range of AWS resources and services, including EC2 instances, load balancers, RDS databases, and more. CloudFormation is tightly integrated with other AWS services, making it easy to provision and manage resources in an AWS environment.

  2. GitLab: GitLab, on the other hand, is a complete DevOps platform that provides a suite of tools for the entire software development lifecycle. GitLab includes features for version control, continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD), container registry, and more. While GitLab does not offer the same level of infrastructure management capabilities as AWS CloudFormation, it provides a powerful platform for collaboration and automation in the software development process. GitLab also supports the use of infrastructure-as-code tools like Terraform for managing infrastructure resources.

  3. Integration with Cloud Providers: AWS CloudFormation is tightly integrated with the AWS ecosystem, allowing users to provision and manage AWS resources easily. It provides native support for a wide range of AWS services, and changes made to the CloudFormation templates can be automatically applied to the corresponding resources. GitLab, on the other hand, is a more agnostic tool and can be used with any cloud provider or on-premises infrastructure. It provides flexibility in choosing infrastructure management tools and allows integration with different cloud providers through its extensive plugin ecosystem.

  4. Sophistication of Infrastructure Management: AWS CloudFormation provides a comprehensive set of features for managing infrastructure resources in an AWS environment. It supports advanced features like rolling updates, change sets, and drift detection, which make it easier to manage and update infrastructure stacks. GitLab, while not as feature-rich in infrastructure management, focuses more on providing collaborative development tools and streamlining the CI/CD process. It offers simpler infrastructure management capabilities through its integration with tools like Terraform.

  5. Scope of Automation: AWS CloudFormation allows users to automate the entire infrastructure provisioning process. Users can define infrastructure resources, specify dependencies, and configure parameters and outputs in the CloudFormation templates. CloudFormation enables the creation of reusable templates and stacks, making it easy to scale and manage infrastructure resources. GitLab, on the other hand, focuses more on automation within the software development process. It provides features like CI/CD pipelines, integration with containerization tools, and built-in code quality testing, enabling end-to-end automation of the development workflow.

  6. Multi-Cloud Support: AWS CloudFormation is primarily designed for managing infrastructure resources in the AWS environment. While it supports some degree of multi-cloud deployment, it is more tightly integrated with AWS services. GitLab, on the other hand, is a more versatile tool that can be used with multiple cloud providers. It provides a consistent platform for managing infrastructure and application code across different environments, making it easier to adopt a multi-cloud strategy.

In summary, AWS CloudFormation is a specialized tool for infrastructure management in the AWS environment, offering extensive integration with AWS services and sophisticated features for infrastructure provisioning and management. GitLab, on the other hand, is a broader DevOps platform that provides collaboration, automation, and integration capabilities throughout the software development lifecycle, supporting multi-cloud deployments and infrastructure-as-code practices.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS CloudFormation, GitLab

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
GitLab
GitLab

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

AWS CloudFormation comes with the following ready-to-run sample templates: WordPress (blog),Tracks (project tracking), Gollum (wiki used by GitHub), Drupal (content management), Joomla (content management), Insoshi (social apps), Redmine (project mgmt);No Need to Reinvent the Wheel – A template can be used repeatedly to create identical copies of the same stack (or to use as a foundation to start a new stack);Transparent and Open – Templates are simple JSON formatted text files that can be placed under your normal source control mechanisms, stored in private or public locations such as Amazon S3 and exchanged via email.;Declarative and Flexible – To create the infrastructure you want, you enumerate what AWS resources, configuration values and interconnections you need in a template and then let AWS CloudFormation do the rest with a few simple clicks in the AWS Management Console, via the command line tools or by calling the APIs.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
63.4K
Followers
1.3K
Followers
54.5K
Votes
88
Votes
2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 43
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 21
    Declarative infrastructure and deployment
  • 13
    No more clicking around
  • 3
    Any Operative System you want
  • 3
    Atomic
Cons
  • 4
    Brittle
  • 2
    No RBAC and policies in templates
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature

What are some alternatives to AWS CloudFormation, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana