AWS CodeCommit vs Xcode

Overview

Xcode

Stacks19.3K

Followers14.7K

Votes213

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks324

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Xcode: What are the differences?

Hosting Environment: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that is cloud-based, allowing users to store and collaborate on their code securely. On the other hand, Xcode is an integrated development environment (IDE) developed by Apple specifically for macOS, used for developing software for Apple devices.
Usage: AWS CodeCommit primarily serves as a repository for storing code and supporting collaboration among developers, while Xcode is a comprehensive IDE that includes tools for coding, testing, and debugging applications for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS platforms.
Platform Compatibility: AWS CodeCommit is platform agnostic, meaning it can be accessed and used on any operating system that supports Git, the version control system it is built on. Xcode, however, is exclusive to macOS, limiting its use to developers who work on Apple's operating systems.
Integration: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other Amazon Web Services tools like AWS CodePipeline for continuous integration and deployment, whereas Xcode is integrated with Apple's developer tools and services such as TestFlight for beta testing and App Store Connect for app submission to the App Store.
Cost: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active users and the amount of data stored and transferred, while Xcode is free to use for macOS users but requires a paid Apple Developer account to access features like app distribution and testing on physical devices.
Community Support: Xcode benefits from a large and active community of iOS and macOS developers who contribute tutorials, resources, and open-source projects to support fellow developers, while AWS CodeCommit's support largely comes from the AWS community and official documentation provided by Amazon Web Services.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and Xcode differ in terms of hosting environment, usage, platform compatibility, integration, cost, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Xcode	AWS CodeCommit
The Xcode IDE is at the center of the Apple development experience. Tightly integrated with the Cocoa and Cocoa Touch frameworks, Xcode is an incredibly productive environment for building amazing apps for Mac, iPhone, and iPad.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Source Editor;Assistant Editor;Asset Catalog;OpenGL Frame Capture;Version Editor;Interface Builder Built In;iOS Simulator;Integrated Build System;Continuous Integration;Instrument Library;Command Line Tools	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks 19.3K	Stacks 324
Followers 14.7K	Followers 826
Votes 213	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 130 IOS Development 33 Personal assistant on steroids 29 Easy setup 17 Excellent integration with Clang 3 Beautiful Cons 6 Massively bloated and complicated for smaller projects 3 Horrible auto completiting and text editing 1 Very slow emulator 1 Slow startup	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 NO LFS support 2 No webhooks
Integrations
Cocoa Touch (iOS) Cocoa (OS X)	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Xcode, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

PhpStorm

PhpStorm is a PHP IDE which keeps up with latest PHP & web languages trends, integrates a variety of modern tools, and brings even more extensibility with support for major PHP frameworks.

IntelliJ IDEA

Out of the box, IntelliJ IDEA provides a comprehensive feature set including tools and integrations with the most important modern technologies and frameworks for enterprise and web development with Java, Scala, Groovy and other languages.

Visual Studio

Visual Studio is a suite of component-based software development tools and other technologies for building powerful, high-performance applications.

WebStorm

WebStorm is a lightweight and intelligent IDE for front-end development and server-side JavaScript.

NetBeans IDE

NetBeans IDE is FREE, open source, and has a worldwide community of users and developers.

PyCharm

PyCharm’s smart code editor provides first-class support for Python, JavaScript, CoffeeScript, TypeScript, CSS, popular template languages and more. Take advantage of language-aware code completion, error detection, and on-the-fly code fixes!

Eclipse

Standard Eclipse package suited for Java and plug-in development plus adding new plugins; already includes Git, Marketplace Client, source code and developer documentation. Click here to file a bug against Eclipse Platform.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

AWS CodeCommit vs Xcode: What are the differences?

Hosting Environment: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that is cloud-based, allowing users to store and collaborate on their code securely. On the other hand, Xcode is an integrated development environment (IDE) developed by Apple specifically for macOS, used for developing software for Apple devices.
Usage: AWS CodeCommit primarily serves as a repository for storing code and supporting collaboration among developers, while Xcode is a comprehensive IDE that includes tools for coding, testing, and debugging applications for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS platforms.
Platform Compatibility: AWS CodeCommit is platform agnostic, meaning it can be accessed and used on any operating system that supports Git, the version control system it is built on. Xcode, however, is exclusive to macOS, limiting its use to developers who work on Apple's operating systems.
Integration: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other Amazon Web Services tools like AWS CodePipeline for continuous integration and deployment, whereas Xcode is integrated with Apple's developer tools and services such as TestFlight for beta testing and App Store Connect for app submission to the App Store.
Cost: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active users and the amount of data stored and transferred, while Xcode is free to use for macOS users but requires a paid Apple Developer account to access features like app distribution and testing on physical devices.
Community Support: Xcode benefits from a large and active community of iOS and macOS developers who contribute tutorials, resources, and open-source projects to support fellow developers, while AWS CodeCommit's support largely comes from the AWS community and official documentation provided by Amazon Web Services.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and Xcode differ in terms of hosting environment, usage, platform compatibility, integration, cost, and community support.