StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Jetty

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Jetty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes241
Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Jetty: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Jetty are both platforms that are used for deploying and managing applications. However, they have several key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Scalability and Elasticity: One major difference between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Jetty is their scalability and elasticity capabilities. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed to automatically scale the underlying infrastructure based on application demand. It can handle traffic spikes and automatically add or remove resources as needed. On the other hand, Jetty does not have built-in auto-scaling capabilities and requires manual configuration to scale the application and handle increased traffic.

  2. Managed Platform vs Self-Hosted: Another key difference is that AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a managed platform, whereas Jetty is a self-hosted web server. With Elastic Beanstalk, AWS takes care of the backend infrastructure and handles tasks such as provisioning resources, managing deployments, and handling application health monitoring. In contrast, with Jetty, the user is responsible for managing and configuring the web server themselves.

  3. Ease of Deployment and Configuration: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides a simple and intuitive interface for deploying and managing applications. It takes care of the complex underlying infrastructure and automates tasks such as application health monitoring, load balancing, and auto-scaling. Jetty, on the other hand, requires manual configuration and setup for these tasks. It requires more technical expertise and knowledge to deploy and configure applications.

  4. Integration with AWS Services: AWS Elastic Beanstalk seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, allowing users to easily incorporate services like AWS RDS for database management, Amazon S3 for storing and retrieving static files, and AWS CloudFront for content delivery. Jetty, being a self-hosted web server, does not come with these built-in integrations and requires additional setup and configuration to incorporate these services.

  5. Multi-platform Support: AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, including Java, .NET, Python, Ruby, and more. It provides a platform-agnostic approach, allowing developers to deploy applications built in different languages or frameworks. Jetty, on the other hand, is primarily used for Java applications and may not have native support for other programming languages.

  6. Cost Structure: The cost structure for AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Jetty also differs. Elastic Beanstalk follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users only pay for the resources they consume. The pricing is transparent and can be easily estimated based on resource usage. Jetty, being a self-hosted web server, typically requires the user to provision and manage their own resources, which can lead to additional costs for infrastructure and maintenance.

In summary, the key differences between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Jetty lie in their scalability and elasticity capabilities, managed platform vs self-hosted nature, ease of deployment and configuration, integration with AWS services, multi-platform support, and cost structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Jetty
Jetty

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Elastic Beanstalk is built using familiar software stacks such as the Apache HTTP Server for Node.js, PHP and Python, Passenger for Ruby, IIS 7.5 for .NET, and Apache Tomcat for Java;There is no additional charge for Elastic Beanstalk - you pay only for the AWS resources needed to store and run your applications.;Easy to begin – Elastic Beanstalk is a quick and simple way to deploy your application to AWS. You simply use the AWS Management Console, Git deployment, or an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Eclipse or Visual Studio to upload your application;Impossible to outgrow – Elastic Beanstalk automatically scales your application up and down based on default Auto Scaling settings;Complete control – Elastic Beanstalk lets you "open the hood" and retain full control over the AWS resources powering your application;Flexible – You have the freedom to select the Amazon EC2 instance type that is optimal for your application based on CPU and memory requirements, and can choose from several available database options;Reliable – Elastic Beanstalk runs within Amazon's proven network infrastructure and datacenters, and provides an environment where developers can run applications requiring high durability and availability.
Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
Statistics
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
510
Followers
1.8K
Followers
311
Votes
241
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
Cons
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 6
    Very thin
  • 6
    Scalable
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Papertrail
Papertrail
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Jetty?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase