StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Microsoft IIS

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Microsoft IIS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes241
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Microsoft IIS.

  1. Deployment and Management: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides a fully managed platform that handles deployment, scaling, and monitoring of applications. It abstracts the underlying infrastructure and automates application deployment, while providing centralized management and monitoring capabilities. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS is a web server software that requires manual installation, configuration, and management of the server and applications.

  2. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers autoscaling capabilities, allowing applications to automatically scale based on demand. It supports multiple environments (e.g., development, testing, production) and provides configuration templates to quickly deploy and manage applications. Microsoft IIS, while it can be deployed in a load-balanced environment, does not provide built-in autoscaling capabilities or environment management features out of the box.

  3. Platform Compatibility: AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, including Java, Python, .NET, and more. It seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, enabling developers to build scalable and fault-tolerant applications. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS primarily supports applications written in the .NET framework and is tightly integrated with Windows Server and other Microsoft technologies.

  4. Cost: AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a pay-as-you-go service, allowing users to pay only for the resources they consume. The pricing is based on factors such as instance types, storage, and data transfer. Microsoft IIS, being a software product, requires a one-time license fee for the Windows Server operating system and additional costs for hardware, maintenance, and support.

  5. Community and Support: AWS Elastic Beanstalk has a large and active community of users, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums available. It also benefits from the overall support provided by AWS, which includes technical assistance and enterprise-grade support options. Microsoft IIS also has a strong user community and official documentation, but the level of support may vary depending on the licensing and support contracts.

  6. Integration with Development Tools and Services: AWS Elastic Beanstalk integrates well with popular development tools and services, including AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeBuild, enabling easy integration and continuous deployment workflows. Microsoft IIS supports integration with Visual Studio and other Microsoft development tools, providing a seamless development and deployment experience for .NET applications.

In summary, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a fully managed platform that offers automated deployment, scalability, and central management, supporting a wide range of platforms and programming languages, while Microsoft IIS is a web server software that requires manual installation and management, primarily focusing on .NET applications and Windows Server integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Microsoft IIS

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Elastic Beanstalk is built using familiar software stacks such as the Apache HTTP Server for Node.js, PHP and Python, Passenger for Ruby, IIS 7.5 for .NET, and Apache Tomcat for Java;There is no additional charge for Elastic Beanstalk - you pay only for the AWS resources needed to store and run your applications.;Easy to begin – Elastic Beanstalk is a quick and simple way to deploy your application to AWS. You simply use the AWS Management Console, Git deployment, or an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Eclipse or Visual Studio to upload your application;Impossible to outgrow – Elastic Beanstalk automatically scales your application up and down based on default Auto Scaling settings;Complete control – Elastic Beanstalk lets you "open the hood" and retain full control over the AWS resources powering your application;Flexible – You have the freedom to select the Amazon EC2 instance type that is optimal for your application based on CPU and memory requirements, and can choose from several available database options;Reliable – Elastic Beanstalk runs within Amazon's proven network infrastructure and datacenters, and provides an environment where developers can run applications requiring high durability and availability.
-
Statistics
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
15.5K
Followers
1.8K
Followers
7.7K
Votes
241
Votes
236
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
Cons
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Papertrail
Papertrail
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Microsoft IIS?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase