StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Apache Tomcat

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Apache Tomcat

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes241
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Apache Tomcat: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When considering deploying Java applications, developers have the option to choose between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Apache Tomcat. Understanding the key differences between these two options is essential for making an informed decision.

1. **Deployment Complexity**: AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering that simplifies the deployment of applications by providing infrastructure management. In contrast, Apache Tomcat is an open-source web server and servlet container that requires manual configuration and management of the server environment.
   
2. **Scalability**: Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the scaling of resources based on application load, making it easier to manage changing traffic patterns. On the other hand, Tomcat requires manual intervention to scale resources, which can be a more labor-intensive process.
   
3. **Monitoring and Management**: Elastic Beanstalk offers built-in monitoring and management tools to track application performance and health. Apache Tomcat, while providing some monitoring capabilities, often requires third-party tools or additional configurations for comprehensive monitoring.
   
4. **Ease of Use**: Elastic Beanstalk provides a user-friendly interface for deploying and managing applications, making it ideal for developers who prioritize simplicity and speed. In comparison, setting up and configuring Apache Tomcat may require more technical expertise and time investment.
   
5. **Cost Structure**: Elastic Beanstalk follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the resources they consume. Apache Tomcat, being open-source software, is free to use but may incur costs for hosting and infrastructure maintenance.
   
6. **Flexibility**: While Elastic Beanstalk offers a managed platform with limited customization options, Apache Tomcat grants developers greater flexibility to configure and optimize the server environment to meet specific application requirements.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Apache Tomcat can help developers choose the right deployment option based on their project's requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Apache Tomcat

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Elastic Beanstalk is built using familiar software stacks such as the Apache HTTP Server for Node.js, PHP and Python, Passenger for Ruby, IIS 7.5 for .NET, and Apache Tomcat for Java;There is no additional charge for Elastic Beanstalk - you pay only for the AWS resources needed to store and run your applications.;Easy to begin – Elastic Beanstalk is a quick and simple way to deploy your application to AWS. You simply use the AWS Management Console, Git deployment, or an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Eclipse or Visual Studio to upload your application;Impossible to outgrow – Elastic Beanstalk automatically scales your application up and down based on default Auto Scaling settings;Complete control – Elastic Beanstalk lets you "open the hood" and retain full control over the AWS resources powering your application;Flexible – You have the freedom to select the Amazon EC2 instance type that is optimal for your application based on CPU and memory requirements, and can choose from several available database options;Reliable – Elastic Beanstalk runs within Amazon's proven network infrastructure and datacenters, and provides an environment where developers can run applications requiring high durability and availability.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
16.9K
Followers
1.8K
Followers
12.6K
Votes
241
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
Cons
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Papertrail
Papertrail
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Apache Tomcat?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase