StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Service Discovery
  5. AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs SmartStack

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs SmartStack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SmartStack
SmartStack
Stacks7
Followers51
Votes1
GitHub Stars245
Forks44
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
Stacks12.8K
Followers8.8K
Votes59

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs SmartStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and SmartStack, two popular options for load balancing in cloud environments.

  1. Load Balancing Technology: AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) is a managed load balancing service provided by Amazon Web Services, offering multiple types of load balancers such as Application Load Balancers, Network Load Balancers, and Classic Load Balancers. On the other hand, SmartStack is an open-source tool that integrates with Consul for service discovery and HAProxy for load balancing, providing a more customizable and flexible solution.

  2. Integration and Compatibility: ELB is tightly integrated with other AWS services, allowing for seamless connection and management within the AWS ecosystem. SmartStack, on the other hand, can be used in any environment where Consul and HAProxy can run, offering more flexibility in deployment scenarios.

  3. Customization and Control: SmartStack provides more control over the load balancing configuration, enabling users to fine-tune settings based on specific requirements. ELB, while offering ease of use, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to a self-managed solution like SmartStack.

  4. Scalability and Performance: ELB is designed to automatically scale based on incoming traffic and can handle high volumes of requests with minimal configuration. SmartStack's scalability and performance depend on the underlying infrastructure and configuration, requiring more manual intervention for optimization in comparison.

  5. Cost Considerations: ELB is a managed service with usage-based pricing, which can vary depending on the amount of traffic and features utilized. SmartStack being open-source, may offer cost savings in terms of infrastructure expenses but may require additional resources for maintenance and monitoring.

  6. Community Support and Updates: While ELB receives updates and improvements from AWS on a regular basis, SmartStack's development and support depend on the open-source community and maintainers, potentially affecting the availability of new features and bug fixes.

In Summary,

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and SmartStack differ in terms of load balancing technology, integration, customization, scalability, cost, and community support.选择帮助您更好地了解商品并提供相关服务。

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SmartStack
SmartStack
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

Scaling a web infrastructure requires services, and building a service-oriented infrastructure is hard. Make it EASY, with SmartStack’s automated, transparent service discovery and registration: cruise control for your distributed infrastructure.

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Within a health check interval’s delay of a backend becoming healthy, it is made available in Zookeeper;this makes it instantly available to consumers via Synapse’s Zookeeper watches.;We detect problems within a health check interval, and take backends out of rotation. A mechanism which allows services to notify Nerve that they’re not healthy is planned, to reduce the interval further. In the meantime, deploys can stop Nerve when they start, and then re-start it at the end.;Synapse acts on information the moment it’s published in Zookeeper, and reconfiguring HAProxy is very very fast most of the time. Because we utilize HAProxy’s stats socket for many changes, we don’t even restart the process unless we have to add new backends.;Because our infrastructure is distributed, we cannot do centralized planning. But HAProxy provides very configurable queueing semantics. For our biggest clients, we set up intelligent queueing at the HAProxy layer;for others, we at least guarantee round-robin.;Doing debugging or maintenance on a backend is as simple as stopping the Nerve process on the machine;nothing else is affected!;You can see exactly which backends are available simply by looking at the HAProxy status page. Because of HAProxy’s excellent log output, you also get amazing aggregate and per-request information, including statistics on number of behavior of requests right in rsyslog.;The infrastructure is completely distributed. The most critical nodes are the Zookeeper nodes, and Zookeeper is specifically designed to be distributed and robust against failure.
Distribution of requests to Amazon EC2 instances (servers) in multiple Availability Zones so that the risk of overloading one single instance is minimized. And if an entire Availability Zone goes offline, Elastic Load Balancing routes traffic to instances in other Availability Zones.;Continuous monitoring of the health of Amazon EC2 instances registered with the load balancer so that requests are sent only to the healthy instances. If an instance becomes unhealthy, Elastic Load Balancing stops sending traffic to that instance and spreads the load across the remaining healthy instances.;Support for end-to-end traffic encryption on those networks that use secure (HTTPS/SSL) connections.;The ability to take over the encryption and decryption work from the Amazon EC2 instances, and manage it centrally on the load balancer.;Support for the sticky session feature, which is the ability to "stick" user sessions to specific Amazon EC2 instances.;Association of the load balancer with your domain name. Because the load balancer is the only computer that is exposed to the Internet, you don’t have to create and manage public domain names for the instances that the load balancer manages. You can point the instance's domain records at the load balancer instead and scale as needed (either adding or removing capacity) without having to update the records with each scaling activity.;When used in an Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC), support for creation and management of security groups associated with your load balancer to provide additional networking and security options.;Supports use of both the Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).
Statistics
GitHub Stars
245
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
44
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7
Stacks
12.8K
Followers
51
Followers
8.8K
Votes
1
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Elegant and powerful
Pros
  • 48
    Easy
  • 8
    ASG integration
  • 2
    Reliability
  • 1
    Coding
  • 0
    SSL offloading
Integrations
Chef
Chef
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to SmartStack, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Traefik

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

Eureka

Eureka

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

Zookeeper

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Envoy

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Keepalived

Keepalived

The main goal of this project is to provide simple and robust facilities for loadbalancing and high-availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures.

Hipache

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana