Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS Greengrass vs Google Cloud IoT Core: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this markdown, we will outline the key differences between AWS Greengrass and Google Cloud IoT Core. Both of these platforms offer IoT (Internet of Things) services, but they have some distinct features that set them apart.
Deployment and Connectivity: AWS Greengrass allows devices to run AWS Lambda functions locally on edge devices, enabling offline data analysis and local computing. On the other hand, Google Cloud IoT Core focuses more on cloud-based computing, relying on the cloud for processing and analysis.
Device Management: AWS Greengrass offers comprehensive device management capabilities such as device provisioning, configuration, and OTA (over-the-air) updates. It provides in-depth control over edge devices. In contrast, Google Cloud IoT Core also provides device management features but is more focused on managing devices at scale, making it suitable for large-scale deployments.
Integration with Platform Services: AWS Greengrass is tightly integrated with the broader AWS ecosystem, providing seamless integration with other AWS services like AWS IoT, AWS Lambda, AWS IoT Analytics, etc. This enables users to leverage the extensive capabilities of AWS for building end-to-end IoT solutions. In comparison, Google Cloud IoT Core is part of the Google Cloud Platform, offering integration with various Google services like Google Cloud Pub/Sub, Google Cloud Functions, and BigQuery.
Data Analytics: With AWS Greengrass, data analysis can be done locally on edge devices using AWS Lambda functions, allowing for real-time decision making. However, in the case of Google Cloud IoT Core, the focus is more on forwarding the device-generated data to Google Cloud Pub/Sub for further processing and analysis using Google Cloud Dataflow, BigQuery, or other platform services.
Protocol Support: AWS Greengrass supports a wide range of protocols, including MQTT, HTTP, and OPC-UA for device connectivity. It provides flexibility in integrating different types of devices. On the other hand, Google Cloud IoT Core primarily supports MQTT and HTTP protocols for device communication.
Pricing Model: AWS Greengrass follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users pay for the resources consumed and the number of Greengrass cores deployed. In contrast, Google Cloud IoT Core follows a pricing model based on the number of registry operations, device state updates, and telemetry events.
In summary, AWS Greengrass emphasizes local computing and device control, seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem, and offers comprehensive device management capabilities. Google Cloud IoT Core, on the other hand, focuses on cloud-based computing, managing devices at scale, and integration with the Google Cloud Platform services for data processing and analysis.
