StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Transfer
  5. AWS Transfer for SFTP vs Mover

AWS Transfer for SFTP vs Mover

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mover
Mover
Stacks1
Followers12
Votes0
AWS Transfer for SFTP
AWS Transfer for SFTP
Stacks19
Followers14
Votes0

AWS Transfer for SFTP vs Mover: What are the differences?

**Introduction**
AWS Transfer for SFTP and Mover are both file transfer services, but they have key differences that cater to different user preferences and requirements.

**1. Scalability**: AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that scales automatically based on demand, whereas Mover requires users to manually adjust resources for scaling purposes.

**2. Integration**: AWS Transfer for SFTP seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as S3 and IAM for enhanced functionality, while Mover primarily focuses on transferring data between cloud storage providers.

**3. Security**: AWS Transfer for SFTP provides a managed Secure File Transfer Protocol service with features like encryption at rest and in transit, automatic encryption key management, and integration with AWS Key Management Service for enhanced security. Mover, on the other hand, offers standard encryption protocols without the advanced security features provided by AWS.

**4. Pricing Model**: AWS Transfer for SFTP follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on usage, while Mover offers fixed pricing plans based on the amount of data transferred, which may be more suitable for users with predictable transfer volumes.

**5. Compliance**: AWS Transfer for SFTP is compliant with various industry standards and regulations, offering features that cater to specific compliance requirements. Mover does not provide the same level of compliance features as AWS.

**6. Administration**: AWS Transfer for SFTP offers centralized user management and monitoring through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing administrators with greater control and visibility. Mover has more limited administration capabilities, which may be sufficient for smaller-scale operations but can be a limitation for larger organizations.

In Summary, AWS Transfer for SFTP and Mover differ in terms of scalability, integration, security, pricing model, compliance, and administration capabilities, catering to different user needs and preferences in file transfer services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mover
Mover
AWS Transfer for SFTP
AWS Transfer for SFTP

Mover is the best way to migrate or back up files between cloud storage providers and traditional servers. We connect to services like Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, OneDrive, FTP, WebDAV, S3 and many others.

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol. AWS helps you seamlessly migrate your file transfer workflows to AWS Transfer for SFTP—by integrating with existing authentication systems, and providing DNS routing with Amazon Route 53—so nothing changes for your customers and partners, or their applications.

Migrate files from any service to any other service.;Create scheduled backups between cloud storage providers.;Archive files;Map hundreds or thousands of users' cloud storage accounts across services.
-
Statistics
Stacks
1
Stacks
19
Followers
12
Followers
14
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Dropbox
Dropbox
Box
Box
Google Drive
Google Drive
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Rackspace Cloud Files
Rackspace Cloud Files
Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53
Amazon S3
Amazon S3

What are some alternatives to Mover, AWS Transfer for SFTP?

cURL

cURL

Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.

WeTransfer

WeTransfer

It is file sharing at its simplest. It works as if your e-mail account can support those large file sizes, you type in your e-mail address and the recipient’s e-mail address, add a message, attach the file, and send.

Flurl

Flurl

It is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library for .NET.

FileZilla

FileZilla

It is a powerful and free software for transferring files over the Internet. It is a very popular FTP client and is used by webmasters from all over the world.

WinSCP

WinSCP

It is a popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows. Copy file between a local computer and remote servers using FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, WebDAV or S3 file transfer protocols.

HTTPie

HTTPie

It is a Modern command line HTTP client – user-friendly curl alternative with intuitive UI, JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, etc

Cyberduck

Cyberduck

It is a libre server and cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows with support for FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox.

telegram-download-deamon

telegram-download-deamon

A simple script to automate telegram download of big files. If you have got an Internet connected computer or NAS and you want to automate file downloading from Telegram channels, this daemon is for you.

MEDoc

MEDoc

It is the best assistant in working with all types of documents in electronic form: tax invoices, acts, invoices and reports.

Couchdrop

Couchdrop

Couchdrop is a cloud-native b2b file exchange platform that simplifies secure file transfers across organizational boundaries with zero infrastructure management.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase