StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Azk vs GitHub Enterprise

Azk vs GitHub Enterprise

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10
Azk
Azk
Stacks11
Followers31
Votes3
GitHub Stars894
Forks55

Azk vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

What is Azk? A lightweight open source engine to orchestrate development environments. azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

What is GitHub Enterprise? The on-premises version of GitHub, which you can deploy and manage in your own, secure environment. GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Azk and GitHub Enterprise are primarily classified as "Virtual Machine Management" and "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools respectively.

Azk is an open source tool with 896 GitHub stars and 61 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Azk's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Azk
Azk

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
894
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
55
Stacks
500
Stacks
11
Followers
627
Followers
31
Votes
10
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Pros
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Preview and use ANY project, hassle-free
Integrations
No integrations available
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Redis
Redis
Crystal
Crystal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Docker
Docker
Ruby
Ruby
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Golang
Golang
NGINX
NGINX

What are some alternatives to GitHub Enterprise, Azk?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Vagrant

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana