StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Secrets Management
  4. Password Management
  5. Azure Active Directory vs JSON Web Token

Azure Active Directory vs JSON Web Token

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Stacks697
Followers283
Votes6
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374

Azure Active Directory vs JSON Web Token: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Azure Active Directory (AAD) and JSON Web Token (JWT). These technologies play important roles in web development, authentication, and authorization processes. Understanding their differences is crucial to effectively implement and secure web applications.

  1. Scopes and Application Roles: Azure Active Directory is a comprehensive cloud-based identity and access management solution provided by Microsoft. It enables authentication and authorization for various resources and services. AAD offers a rich set of features, such as role-based access control, multi-factor authentication, and conditional access policies. On the other hand, JSON Web Token is an open standard for securely transmitting information between parties. JWT focuses on representing claims, or assertions about an entity, as compact and self-contained tokens. It does not provide built-in support for scopes or application roles like AAD.

  2. Centralized Identity Provider: Azure Active Directory is designed to serve as a centralized identity provider for both cloud-based and on-premises applications. It allows organizations to manage and authenticate users across different applications and services using a single set of credentials. AAD supports various authentication methods, including username and password, social media logins, and federated identity providers like Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS). In contrast, JSON Web Token does not provide a centralized identity provider. It is token-based, stateless, and does not maintain user sessions or authentication states.

  3. Token Structure and Usage: Azure Active Directory issues security tokens in the form of JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), but with additional information specific to AAD. These tokens contain claims about the user and their permissions, along with other metadata. AAD tokens can be used to authenticate and authorize requests to Azure resources and services. On the other hand, JSON Web Tokens are used primarily for transmitting claims between parties. They consist of three parts: a header, a payload, and a signature. JWTs are often used for authenticating and authorizing access to web APIs or for providing single sign-on capabilities between applications.

  4. Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem: Azure Active Directory integrates seamlessly with various Microsoft services and products, including Azure, Office 365, and Microsoft Graph API. It provides a unified authentication and authorization mechanism for these services, enabling easy user management and access control. Additionally, AAD supports integration with third-party identity providers, allowing organizations to leverage existing identity infrastructure. In contrast, JSON Web Token does not offer direct integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. However, it is widely supported by many programming languages, frameworks, and tools, making it a flexible choice for web application development.

  5. Token Validation and Security: Azure Active Directory provides built-in mechanisms for token validation, including token lifetime validation, signature verification, and token revocation. AAD allows developers to easily validate and trust issued tokens, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the claims. It also supports token encryption and protects sensitive information within the tokens. On the other hand, JSON Web Tokens do not have built-in validation mechanisms. JWT validation typically involves checking the token signature, verifying its expiration and audience, and performing additional custom validations as needed. Developers are responsible for implementing token validation and security measures when using JWTs.

  6. Pricing and Licensing Model: Azure Active Directory offers different pricing tiers, including Free, Basic, Premium P1, and Premium P2. Each tier provides different features and capabilities, with the premium tiers offering more advanced functionality like advanced security reports and self-service password reset. Pricing for AAD is based on per-user subscriptions. JSON Web Token, being an open standard, does not have specific pricing or licensing requirements. It can be freely used and implemented in web applications based on individual needs and requirements.

In Summary, Azure Active Directory is a comprehensive identity and access management solution with features like role-based access control, centralized identity provider, and integration with Microsoft services, while JSON Web Token is an open standard primarily used for transmitting claims between parties, focusing on token structure and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

-
compact;self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
374
Stacks
697
Stacks
1.8K
Followers
283
Followers
367
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Backed by Microsoft Azure
Cons
  • 3
    Closed source
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Azure Active Directory, JSON Web Token?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope