StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Secrets Management
  4. Password Management
  5. Azure Active Directory vs Ping Identity

Azure Active Directory vs Ping Identity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ping Identity
Ping Identity
Stacks18
Followers75
Votes37
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Stacks697
Followers283
Votes6

Azure Active Directory vs Ping Identity: What are the differences?

### Introduction
When comparing Azure Active Directory and Ping Identity, there are notable differences that organizations should consider to choose the best Identity and Access Management solution for their needs.

### 1. Scalability:
Azure Active Directory offers a highly scalable solution, allowing organizations to support a large number of users and applications without significant performance concerns. On the other hand, Ping Identity provides a more flexible scalability approach, catering to specific needs of enterprises with varying sizes and complexities. 

### 2. Integration Capabilities:
Azure Active Directory is tightly integrated with other Microsoft services and applications, creating a seamless experience for organizations already using Microsoft products. In contrast, Ping Identity offers robust integration capabilities with various third-party applications and services, making it a versatile choice for organizations with diverse IT environments.

### 3. Authentication Methods:
Azure Active Directory supports a wide range of authentication methods, including multi-factor authentication and conditional access policies, enhancing security measures for organizations. Ping Identity, on the other hand, offers advanced authentication methods such as Adaptive Authentication, enabling organizations to implement context-based security measures for enhanced protection.

### 4. Customization Options:
Azure Active Directory provides a range of out-of-the-box features and configurations, simplifying setup and management for organizations looking for standard identity solutions. In comparison, Ping Identity offers extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor the identity and access management system to meet specific business requirements and compliance needs.

### 5. Pricing Model:
Azure Active Directory is bundled within Microsoft's licensing plans, making it a cost-effective solution for organizations already using Microsoft products and services. Ping Identity, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based pricing model, providing flexibility for organizations to choose the features and services they require without paying for unnecessary functionalities.

### 6. Support and Services:
Azure Active Directory offers comprehensive support services through Microsoft's extensive support network, ensuring organizations have access to assistance when needed. Ping Identity provides personalized support options, including dedicated customer success managers and consulting services, offering organizations a tailored approach to addressing their identity and access management needs.

In Summary, Azure Active Directory and Ping Identity differ in areas such as scalability, integration capabilities, authentication methods, customization options, pricing model, and support services, providing organizations with options to choose the best-suited solution for their identity and access management requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ping Identity
Ping Identity
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory

It provides an identity and access management platform enabling the right people access to the right things seamlessly and securely.

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

Authenticate users leveraging any mobile device and contextual mobile data.; Enable secure single sign-on to any application from anywhere on any device.; Authorize access to only the web, mobile and API resources users need.
-
Statistics
Stacks
18
Stacks
697
Followers
75
Followers
283
Votes
37
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    OIDC
  • 3
    IdP
  • 3
    SSO
  • 3
    SAML
  • 2
    Third Party IdP
Pros
  • 6
    Backed by Microsoft Azure
Cons
  • 3
    Closed source

What are some alternatives to Ping Identity, Azure Active Directory?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Okta

Okta

Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope