StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Azure Service Bus vs MediatR

Azure Service Bus vs MediatR

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Service Bus
Azure Service Bus
Stacks553
Followers536
Votes7
MediatR
MediatR
Stacks134
Followers41
Votes0

Azure Service Bus vs MediatR: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Azure Service Bus and MediatR. Both Azure Service Bus and MediatR are popular tools used in the development of applications. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features that make them suitable for different scenarios.

  1. Message Broker vs. Mediator Pattern: Azure Service Bus is a message broker that enables well-defined communication between applications or components by facilitating messaging patterns such as publish/subscribe, request/reply, and more. On the other hand, MediatR is a mediator pattern implementation that helps in decoupling the communication between different components within an application using a mediator class. While both handle messaging and communication, they serve different architectural needs.

  2. Deployment and Management: Azure Service Bus is a cloud-based messaging service provided by Microsoft Azure. It requires provisioning and management of Azure resources such as Service Bus namespaces and entities like queues, topics, subscriptions, etc. It provides scalability, reliability, and other management features out of the box. MediatR, on the other hand, is a NuGet package that can be easily integrated into an application without any additional infrastructure setup. It is straightforward to deploy and manage within the application codebase.

  3. Messaging Patterns: Azure Service Bus offers various messaging patterns like publish/subscribe, request/reply, temporal messaging, dead-lettering, and more. These patterns are suitable for building distributed systems and handling event-driven scenarios. MediatR, on the other hand, focuses on the mediator pattern, which is primarily used for in-process communication within an application. It helps in decoupling application components and simplifying communication logic.

  4. Message Transformation and Routing: Azure Service Bus provides rich features for transforming and routing messages using filters and rules. It supports content-based routing, where messages can be selectively routed to different entities based on their content. It also allows for the modification of message properties and body during the transformation process. MediatR does not provide built-in features for message transformation and routing. It primarily focuses on handling communication between application components.

  5. Message Transformation and Routing: Azure Service Bus provides rich features for transforming and routing messages using filters and rules. It supports content-based routing, where messages can be selectively routed to different entities based on their content. It also allows for the modification of message properties and body during the transformation process. MediatR does not provide built-in features for message transformation and routing. It primarily focuses on handling communication between application components.

  6. Error Handling and Retry Policies: Azure Service Bus offers built-in error handling and retry policies for handling transient failures and message processing errors. It provides mechanisms to handle dead-letter messages and implement custom retry policies. MediatR does not provide built-in error handling or retry policies. Error handling and retry mechanisms need to be implemented explicitly within the application code using exception handling or other error-handling patterns.

In summary, Azure Service Bus is a cloud-based messaging service that facilitates various messaging patterns and provides rich features like message transformation, routing, and error handling. On the other hand, MediatR is a mediator pattern implementation that helps in decoupling communication between application components within an application. Both serve different architectural needs and have their own strengths depending on the requirements of the application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Service Bus
Azure Service Bus
MediatR
MediatR

It is a cloud messaging system for connecting apps and devices across public and private clouds. You can depend on it when you need highly-reliable cloud messaging service between applications and services, even when one or more is offline.

It is a low-ambition library trying to solve a simple problem — decoupling the in-process sending of messages from handling messages. Cross-platform, supporting .NET Framework 4.6.1 and netstandard2.0.

-
Request/response messages, dispatched to a single handler; Notification messages, dispatched to multiple handlers
Statistics
Stacks
553
Stacks
134
Followers
536
Followers
41
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy Integration with .Net
  • 2
    Cloud Native
  • 1
    Use while high messaging need
Cons
  • 1
    Skills can only be used in Azure - vendor lock-in
  • 1
    Observability of messages in the queue is lacking
  • 1
    Limited features in Basic tier
  • 1
    Lacking in JMS support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Azure Service Bus, MediatR?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase