Azure Synapse vs Google BigQuery

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Synapse

100
227
+ 1
10
Google BigQuery

1.7K
1.5K
+ 1
152
Add tool

Azure Synapse vs Google BigQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Synapse and Google BigQuery are two popular cloud-based data warehouse solutions that offer fast and scalable data analytics capabilities. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Integration and Ecosystem: Azure Synapse is tightly integrated with the broader Azure ecosystem, providing seamless integration with other Azure services such as Azure Data Factory, Azure Machine Learning, and Power BI. On the other hand, Google BigQuery is part of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP), which offers a wide range of complementary services such as Google Dataflow and Google Cloud Storage.

  2. Performance and Concurrency: Azure Synapse offers dedicated SQL pools, allowing users to provision dedicated compute and storage resources for specific workloads. This provides better performance and higher concurrency for complex queries. In contrast, Google BigQuery uses an architecture that automatically scales resources based on demand, providing a serverless experience. While this offers ease of use and scalability, it may result in slightly lower performance for complex queries.

  3. Pricing Model: Azure Synapse offers a flexible pricing model that allows users to choose between provisioned resources and on-demand serverless options, providing cost optimization based on workload requirements. On the other hand, Google BigQuery uses a pricing model based on usage, where users are billed based on the amount of data processed and the storage used. This can provide cost savings for sporadic or unpredictable workloads.

  4. Data Import and Export: Azure Synapse provides native integrations with various data sources and supports both batch and real-time data ingestion. It offers connectors to common data sources such as Azure Blob Storage, Azure SQL Database, and popular big data frameworks like Apache Kafka and Apache Spark. Google BigQuery also provides various data connectors and supports batch data import/export, but it lacks support for real-time streaming ingestion out of the box.

  5. Data Partitioning and Clustering: Azure Synapse supports data partitioning and clustering, allowing users to optimize query performance by organizing data based on specific columns, reducing the amount of data scanned during query execution. This is especially useful for large datasets. Google BigQuery offers a similar concept called partitioned tables but does not provide native support for data clustering, requiring users to manually organize data to achieve similar optimizations.

  6. Machine Learning Capabilities: Azure Synapse provides integration with Azure Machine Learning, allowing users to build, train, and deploy machine learning models directly from the platform. Additionally, it offers built-in support for automated machine learning and model explainability. Google BigQuery also offers integration with Google Cloud AI Platform, providing similar machine learning capabilities. However, it does not have built-in support for automated machine learning.

In summary, Azure Synapse and Google BigQuery differ in terms of integration with their respective cloud ecosystems, flexibility in pricing models, performance and concurrency options, support for data import/export, data optimization techniques, and machine learning capabilities. The choice between them depends on specific requirements, preferences, and existing cloud platform investments.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Azure Synapse
Pros of Google BigQuery
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
  • 28
    High Performance
  • 25
    Easy to use
  • 22
    Fully managed service
  • 19
    Cheap Pricing
  • 16
    Process hundreds of GB in seconds
  • 12
    Big Data
  • 11
    Full table scans in seconds, no indexes needed
  • 8
    Always on, no per-hour costs
  • 6
    Good combination with fluentd
  • 4
    Machine learning
  • 1
    Easy to manage
  • 0
    Easy to learn

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Azure Synapse
Cons of Google BigQuery
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
  • 1
    Concurrency
  • 1
    You can't unit test changes in BQ data
  • 0
    Sdas

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Azure Synapse?

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

What is Google BigQuery?

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Azure Synapse and Google BigQuery as a desired skillset
What companies use Azure Synapse?
What companies use Google BigQuery?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Azure Synapse?
What tools integrate with Google BigQuery?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

Segment

PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
7
2624
Jul 2 2019 at 9:34PM

Segment

Google AnalyticsAmazon S3New Relic+25
10
6882
GitHubPythonNode.js+47
55
72785
What are some alternatives to Azure Synapse and Google BigQuery?
MySQL
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Redis
Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
Amazon S3
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
See all alternatives