Baget vs MyGet

Overview

MyGet

Stacks17

Followers9

Votes0

Baget

Stacks13

Followers7

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks755

Baget vs MyGet: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and discuss the key differences between Baget and MyGet, which are both package managers for .NET development.

1. Purpose and Target Audience: Baget is designed as a lightweight and simple package registry, primarily meant for internal usage within an organization. It focuses on providing a minimalistic and self-hosted NuGet-compatible service. On the other hand, MyGet is a fully-featured package management platform that targets both individuals and organizations, offering a range of features like dependency management, build services, and package signing.
2. Hosting: Baget is designed to be hosted on-premises or within a private network. It allows organizations to have full control over their package management infrastructure. In contrast, MyGet is a cloud-based service that offers a cloud-hosted package management solution. This eliminates the need for organizations to maintain their own infrastructure.
3. Pricing and Licensing: Baget is an open-source project released under the MIT License, which means it is free to use and modify. As for MyGet, it offers a range of pricing plans, including a free tier with limited features. Additional features and higher usage quotas are available in paid plans.
4. Features and Functionality: Baget focuses on providing the core functionality of a package registry, such as package storage, searching, and versioning. It does not offer advanced features like build services or feed permissions. On the other hand, MyGet provides a wide range of features, including dependency management, build services, feed permissions, package caching, and webhook support.
5. Integration and Ecosystem: Baget integrates well with other NuGet clients and tools, making it compatible with existing NuGet workflows. MyGet, on the other hand, not only supports NuGet but also other package formats like npm, Maven, and Docker. This makes it more versatile in terms of package management across different ecosystems.
6. Community and Support: Baget has a smaller community and support base compared to MyGet. As an open-source project, Baget relies on community contributions and may have limitations in terms of support and resources. MyGet, being a commercial product, offers dedicated customer support and documentation resources.

In Summary, Baget is a lightweight and simple self-hosted package registry, while MyGet is a feature-rich and cloud-based package management platform, targeting both individuals and organizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

MyGet	Baget
It allows you to create and host your own NuGet feed. Include packages from the official NuGet feed or upload your own NuGet packages. We can also compile and package your source code from GitHub, BitBucket, CodePlex and more!	It is a lightweight NuGet and symbol server. It is open source, cross-platform, and cloud ready.
All your packages in a single endpoint; Continuous Integration: Build Services; Continuous Security: Vulnerability Scanning; Package Dependency Management; Cloud Native & Enterprise Scale; Secure by Design	Cross-platform; Dockerized; Cloud ready; Supports read-through caching; Can index the entirety of nuget.org
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 2.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 755
Stacks 17	Stacks 13
Followers 9	Followers 7
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
PHP npm Apache Maven Bower Python NuGet	Docker Aliyun

What are some alternatives to MyGet, Baget?

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Baget vs MyGet: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and discuss the key differences between Baget and MyGet, which are both package managers for .NET development.

1. Purpose and Target Audience: Baget is designed as a lightweight and simple package registry, primarily meant for internal usage within an organization. It focuses on providing a minimalistic and self-hosted NuGet-compatible service. On the other hand, MyGet is a fully-featured package management platform that targets both individuals and organizations, offering a range of features like dependency management, build services, and package signing.
2. Hosting: Baget is designed to be hosted on-premises or within a private network. It allows organizations to have full control over their package management infrastructure. In contrast, MyGet is a cloud-based service that offers a cloud-hosted package management solution. This eliminates the need for organizations to maintain their own infrastructure.
3. Pricing and Licensing: Baget is an open-source project released under the MIT License, which means it is free to use and modify. As for MyGet, it offers a range of pricing plans, including a free tier with limited features. Additional features and higher usage quotas are available in paid plans.
4. Features and Functionality: Baget focuses on providing the core functionality of a package registry, such as package storage, searching, and versioning. It does not offer advanced features like build services or feed permissions. On the other hand, MyGet provides a wide range of features, including dependency management, build services, feed permissions, package caching, and webhook support.
5. Integration and Ecosystem: Baget integrates well with other NuGet clients and tools, making it compatible with existing NuGet workflows. MyGet, on the other hand, not only supports NuGet but also other package formats like npm, Maven, and Docker. This makes it more versatile in terms of package management across different ecosystems.
6. Community and Support: Baget has a smaller community and support base compared to MyGet. As an open-source project, Baget relies on community contributions and may have limitations in terms of support and resources. MyGet, being a commercial product, offers dedicated customer support and documentation resources.

In Summary, Baget is a lightweight and simple self-hosted package registry, while MyGet is a feature-rich and cloud-based package management platform, targeting both individuals and organizations.