StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. BaseAPI vs Firehose.io

BaseAPI vs Firehose.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firehose.io
Firehose.io
Stacks2
Followers16
Votes7
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
BaseAPI
BaseAPI
Stacks2
Followers7
Votes0

Firehose.io vs BaseAPI: What are the differences?

Developers describe Firehose.io as "Build realtime Ruby web applications". Firehose is both a Rack application and JavaScript library that makes building real-time web applications possible. On the other hand, BaseAPI is detailed as "API for authentication, image and file storage, email sending and more". It offers APIs for projects to handle authentication, email sending, file upload, image upload and processing and more in one service with a nice admin interface It can be used as a service or self-hosted..

Firehose.io and BaseAPI can be primarily classified as "Realtime Backend / API" tools.

Some of the features offered by Firehose.io are:

  • Firehose embraces RESTful design prinicpals and consequently works great with any library that speaks HTTP
  • Integrates with Backbone.js and Ember.js
  • Hook it into an ORM, like ActiveRecord

On the other hand, BaseAPI provides the following key features:

  • Authentication API (with password reset flow)
  • Email sending API
  • Image upload API

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Firehose.io
Firehose.io
BaseAPI
BaseAPI

Firehose is both a Rack application and JavaScript library that makes building real-time web applications possible.

It offers APIs for projects to handle authentication, email sending, file upload, image upload and processing and more in one service with a nice admin interface. It can be used as a service or self-hosted.

Firehose embraces RESTful design prinicpals and consequently works great with any library that speaks HTTP;Integrates with Backbone.js and Ember.js;Hook it into an ORM, like ActiveRecord
Authentication API (with password reset flow); Email sending API; Image upload API; Image processing API; File upload API; Form API; Mailing lists API; Scheduled webhooks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2
Stacks
2
Followers
16
Followers
7
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Rails gem
  • 2
    Works with ActiveRecord
  • 2
    RESTful
  • 1
    Clean way to build real-time web applications
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Ember.js
Ember.js
Crystal
Crystal
cURL
cURL
Ruby
Ruby
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Firehose.io, BaseAPI?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase