StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Google Test vs behave

Google Test vs behave

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Test
Google Test
Stacks16
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars37.4K
Forks10.6K
behave
behave
Stacks67
Followers119
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks656

Google Test vs behave: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Google Test and behave, two popular testing frameworks used in software development. These frameworks have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart from each other.

  1. Syntax and Language: Google Test is written in C++, whereas behave is written in Python. This difference in programming language allows developers to choose the framework that aligns better with their project requirements and their proficiency in a specific programming language.

  2. Testing Styles: Google Test focuses on unit testing, which involves testing individual components or classes in isolation. On the other hand, behave emphasizes behavior-driven development (BDD) and supports feature testing, which involves testing the entire system or software as a whole. This difference in testing styles enables developers to select the framework that suits their specific testing needs.

  3. Test Organization: Google Test organizes tests using classes and test fixtures, allowing developers to group related test cases together. Conversely, behave organizes tests using feature files and scenarios, enabling developers to define tests using plain English-like text and adding structure to the test scenarios. This distinction in test organization provides developers with different approaches to organizing and managing their tests effectively.

  4. Documentation and Community Support: Google Test has comprehensive documentation and a large community of developers using it, providing extensive resources, tutorials, and support. In contrast, behave also has good documentation and community support, but it might not be as extensive or have as many resources available due to its smaller user base. This variation in documentation and community support can influence the availability and accessibility of assistance for developers using these frameworks.

  5. Integration with other Tools: Google Test integrates well into the C++ development ecosystem, making it compatible with numerous build systems, IDEs, and continuous integration (CI) tools commonly used in C++ projects. On the other hand, behave integrates smoothly with the wider Python ecosystem, easily integrating with popular tools such as pytest, Selenium, and others. This integration capability ensures seamless collaboration between testing frameworks and other tools used in the software development workflow.

  6. Test Execution: Google Test typically runs tests in parallel and provides detailed reports on each tested component or class. In contrast, behave runs tests sequentially, focusing on the overall system behavior and providing reports that highlight the system's behavior as a whole. This difference in test execution and reporting allows developers to choose the framework that aligns with their testing requirements and provides the desired level of granularity and information.

In summary, Google Test and behave differ in programming language, testing styles, test organization, documentation and community support, integration with other tools, and test execution. These distinctions allow developers to select the framework that best suits their project requirements, testing approach, and development ecosystem preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Test
Google Test
behave
behave

It is a unit testing library for the C++ programming language, based on the xUnit architecture. The library is released under the BSD 3-clause license. It can be compiled for a variety of POSIX and Windows platforms, allowing unit-testing of C sources as well as C++ with minimal source modification.

It is behaviour-driven development, Python style. It uses tests written in a natural language style, backed up by Python code.

An xUnit test framework; Test discovery; A rich set of assertions; User-defined assertions; Death tests; Fatal and non-fatal failures; Value-parameterized tests; Type-parameterized tests; Various options for running the tests; XML test report generation
bdd; tests; tdd
Statistics
GitHub Stars
37.4K
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Forks
10.6K
GitHub Forks
656
Stacks
16
Stacks
67
Followers
31
Followers
119
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
PlatformIO
PlatformIO
Windows
Windows
C++
C++
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Cygwin
Cygwin
Python
Python
Django
Django
Flask
Flask

What are some alternatives to Google Test, behave?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana