StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Dns Management
  5. BIND9 vs NS1

BIND9 vs NS1

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NS1
NS1
Stacks23
Followers49
Votes8
BIND9
BIND9
Stacks50
Followers53
Votes0

BIND9 vs NS1: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between BIND9 and NS1

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Deployment and Configuration Complexity**: BIND9 requires manual configuration and management of zone files, while NS1 offers a more user-friendly interface for configuring DNS zones through its web portal, reducing the complexity of deployment and configuration tasks.

2. **DNS Resolution Performance**: NS1 provides intelligent traffic routing and advanced load balancing algorithms to optimize DNS resolution performance, providing faster query responses and better user experience compared to BIND9's traditional DNS resolution methods.

3. **Anycast Support**: NS1 supports Anycast routing, enabling the distribution of traffic across multiple geographically dispersed servers, leading to improved redundancy and network resilience, which may not be as easily achievable with BIND9.

4. **Monitoring and Reporting Capabilities**: NS1 offers real-time monitoring and reporting features that provide insights into DNS performance, traffic patterns, and potential issues, allowing for proactive management and troubleshooting, which may be lacking in BIND9.

5. **API Integration and Automation**: NS1 provides robust APIs for seamless integration with various applications and automation tools, allowing for efficient management of DNS infrastructure and dynamic updates, a feature that may be limited or absent in BIND9.

6. **Global Network and Edge Computing**: NS1 leverages a global network of edge nodes to optimize DNS responses and support edge computing capabilities, delivering low latency and high performance for users worldwide, a functionality not inherently present in BIND9's architecture.

In Summary, BIND9 and NS1 differ in deployment complexity, performance optimization, Anycast support, monitoring capabilities, API integration, and global network infrastructure for edge computing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NS1, BIND9

Eric
Eric

Service Engineer at Zix Corporation

Aug 5, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon Route 53Amazon Route 53

We are looking for advice / best-practices / caveats about migrating off BIND on to Unbound https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/about/ for internal & external (customer-facing) DNS. Is unbound suitable for this, or is it only recommended for caching? How easy or difficult is it to move 10000's of existing BIND DNS zone entries? We already use Amazon Route 53 for our AWS instances and Cloud DNS for our GCP ones, but would like to maintain internal DNS for cost, control, and latency reasons.

58.6k views58.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NS1
NS1
BIND9
BIND9

NS1’s intelligent DNS & traffic management platform, with its data driven architecture and unique Filter Chain routing engine, is purpose-built for the most demanding, mission-critical applications on the Internet.

It is a versatile name server software. It has evolved to be a very flexible, full-featured DNS system. Whatever your application is, it probably has the required features.

easy-to-use portal; rest api; monitoring; anycasting; global coverage; 100% uptime; 24x7 support; edns-client-subnet; edns; geotargeting; geoip; geodns; gslb; global server load balancing; load shedding; private dns; user management; team management; real-time change publishing; usage alerts; geofencing; routing filters; weighting; sticky sessions; DR; disaster recovery; failover; dns; managed dns
-
Statistics
Stacks
23
Stacks
50
Followers
49
Followers
53
Votes
8
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Filter Chain routing engine
  • 2
    FAST
  • 2
    Speed
  • 1
    DNSSec
  • 1
    High-Availability
Cons
  • 1
    Price
No community feedback yet
Integrations
New Relic
New Relic
Boundary
Boundary
Pingdom
Pingdom
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to NS1, BIND9?

Amazon Route 53

Amazon Route 53

Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS.

DNSimple

DNSimple

DNSimple provides the tools you need to manage your domains. We offer both a carefully crafted web interface for managing your domains and DNS records, as well as an HTTP API with various code libraries and tools. Buy, connect, operate!

Google Cloud DNS

Google Cloud DNS

Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers.

Dyn

Dyn

An all-in-one Managed DNS service for your registered domain names. Dyn DNS is the perfect solution for your domain name’s DNS needs, whether it is for personal or business use. It gives you complete control over your DNS zone and its associated DNS records, complete with a simple DNS management web interface.

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy is a subsidiary of Tiggee LLC, and is a world leader in providing global IP Anycast enterprise DNS services. DNS Made Easy is currently ranked the fastest provider for 8 consecutive months and the most reliable provider.

CoreDNS

CoreDNS

CoreDNS is a DNS server. It is written in Go. It can be used in a multitude of environments because of its flexibility

nextdns

nextdns

Cloud-based private DNS service that gives you full control over what is allowed and what is blocked on the Internet. Think of it as a combination of Cloudflare DNS and Pi-hole®.

InboxKit

InboxKit

InboxKit automates your entire cold email infrastructure. Buy domains, provision Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 mailboxes, configure DNS, and export to 16+ sequencers — all from one dashboard. Scale from 10 to 10,000 mailboxes without the manual setup headache.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

PowerDNS

PowerDNS

It features a large number of different backends ranging from simple BIND style zonefiles to relational databases and load balancing/failover algorithms. A DNS recursor is provided as a separate program.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope