StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Backup As A Service
  5. BitCalm vs BorgBase

BitCalm vs BorgBase

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BitCalm
BitCalm
Stacks2
Followers8
Votes6
BorgBase
BorgBase
Stacks0
Followers2
Votes0

BitCalm vs BorgBase: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This comparison highlights key differences between BitCalm and BorgBase.

1. **Data Encryption**: BitCalm utilizes end-to-end encryption for data security, ensuring that all user data is fully protected. In contrast, BorgBase offers in-transit encryption but not end-to-end encryption, potentially exposing data vulnerabilities during storage.
   
2. **Backup Storage Options**: BorgBase provides the option to store backups on various cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, expanding storage flexibility. Conversely, BitCalm primarily offers storage on their own servers, limiting storage location choices.
   
3. **Backup Frequency Options**: BitCalm offers more customizable backup frequency options, allowing users to set specific intervals for backups, while BorgBase has fixed backup schedules with less flexibility in customization.
   
4. **Pricing Structure**: BorgBase's pricing is based on the amount of data stored, which can be beneficial for smaller users with less data. In contrast, BitCalm's pricing is flat-rate, which can be advantageous for users with larger storage needs.
   
5. **File Versioning**: BitCalm includes file versioning capabilities, allowing users to restore previous versions of files easily. BorgBase does not offer robust file versioning features, potentially making it challenging to access older versions of files.
   
6. **User Interface**: BitCalm offers a user-friendly interface with intuitive navigation and a sleek design, making it easy for users to manage backups efficiently. BorgBase, while functional, may have a more complex interface that could require a learning curve for some users.

In Summary, BitCalm and BorgBase differ in data encryption, backup storage options, backup frequency choices, pricing structure, file versioning capabilities, and user interface design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

BitCalm
BitCalm
BorgBase
BorgBase

No description available.

It is a dedicated hosting service for Borg backup repositories. It allows you to manage all your backups in one place and use powerful Borg features, like append-only mode in a simple way. You get 10 GB free backup space after signing up (no credit card required).

24/7 online support;Detailed backup statistics;User-friendly web interface for monitoring and configuration;Support for MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB;Client-side files compression & encryption;All your data is sent to the Amazon S3 through SSL
Encrypted and Append-Only; Free and Open Source since 2010; Monitoring Included; Compression and Deduplication; API Access for Easy Automation
Statistics
Stacks
2
Stacks
0
Followers
8
Followers
2
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Tasks of backup configuration no longer take my time.
  • 2
    Easy setup. Fully automated. It just works. Cool!
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to BitCalm, BorgBase?

AWS Backup

AWS Backup

It is a fully managed backup service that makes it easy to centralize and automate the backup of data across AWS services. Using AWS Backup, you can centrally configure backup policies and monitor backup activity for AWS resources, such as Amazon EBS volumes, Amazon EC2 instances, Amazon RDS databases, Amazon DynamoDB tables, Amazon EFS file systems, and AWS Storage Gateway volumes.

Walrus

Walrus

It is a fast, secure and reliable backup system suitable for modern infrastructure. With Walrus, you can backup services like MySQL, PostgreSQL, Redis, etcd or a complete directory with a short interval and low overhead. It supports AWS S3, digitalocean spaces and any S3-compatible object storage service.

Dropmysite

Dropmysite

It is a cloud-based website backup and monitoring service that lets you schedule automatic backups, monitor website uptime, and more. Unfortunately, it is only compatible with shared and managed WordPress Web hosting.

CodeGuard

CodeGuard

CodeGuard offers the most reliable backup on the market with 99.999999999% reliability. We achieve this by replicating your data in secure locations across the world and backing up your site automatically, everyday. Our dashboard tells you exactly when your next backup will occur, how many files were added, changed, or deleted in your previous backups, and lays all of this information out in an easy to understand way.

yesterSite

yesterSite

Cloud backup for your website, daily and automated.

Cloudback

Cloudback

It is a cloud backup service for GitHub repositories. Back up your GitHub repository, fast and secure. Use your favorite cloud storage provider or a built-in one powered by Azure.

Deskree

Deskree

It is an innovative no-code infrastructure tool that enables developers, businesses, and organizations to quickly and easily build powerful backend for their applications in record time. Rapidly create and scale infrastructure with minimal code engagement.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope