Blazor vs GWT

Overview

GWT

Stacks88

Followers100

Votes0

Blazor

Stacks549

Followers724

Votes445

Blazor vs GWT: What are the differences?

Blazor and GWT are both web development frameworks that allow developers to build interactive web applications. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Language: Blazor is primarily based on C# and .NET, whereas GWT is based on Java. This means that developers familiar with the respective languages will have an easier time getting started with the frameworks.
Execution: Blazor applications are executed on the client side, using WebAssembly. This allows for high-performance and rich user experiences. GWT, on the other hand, compiles Java code into JavaScript, which is then executed in the client's browser.
Component Model: Blazor follows a component-based model, where the user interface is built using reusable components. This makes it easier to build and maintain complex applications. GWT, on the other hand, uses a widget-based model, where the user interface is built using pre-defined widgets.
Code Sharing: Blazor allows for code sharing between the server and client, which means that developers can write code that can be executed on both sides. This can lead to more efficient development and maintenance. GWT does not provide this feature.
Tooling: Blazor has strong integration with Visual Studio and offers excellent tooling support. This includes features like debugging, autocompletion, and code refactoring. GWT also has integration with popular IDEs, but the tooling and support may not be as extensive as Blazor.
Maturity: Blazor is a newer framework compared to GWT and is still evolving. While it has gained popularity quickly, it may not have the same level of maturity and community support as GWT. GWT, on the other hand, has been around for a longer time and has a stable and mature ecosystem.

In Summary, Blazor and GWT differ in the languages they are based on, execution methods, component models, code sharing capabilities, tooling support, and maturity of the frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

GWT	Blazor
It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.	Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.
-	Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming
Statistics
Stacks 88	Stacks 549
Followers 100	Followers 724
Votes 0	Votes 445
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 63 Uses C# 49 No need to learn separate language or technology 42 Supports making a single page application 40 Tight integration with .NET project 38 Uses .NET standard library Cons 4 Initial load time 2 Hard to inject javascript
Integrations
No integrations available	.NET C# WebAssembly

What are some alternatives to GWT, Blazor?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Blazor vs GWT: What are the differences?

Blazor and GWT are both web development frameworks that allow developers to build interactive web applications. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Language: Blazor is primarily based on C# and .NET, whereas GWT is based on Java. This means that developers familiar with the respective languages will have an easier time getting started with the frameworks.
Execution: Blazor applications are executed on the client side, using WebAssembly. This allows for high-performance and rich user experiences. GWT, on the other hand, compiles Java code into JavaScript, which is then executed in the client's browser.
Component Model: Blazor follows a component-based model, where the user interface is built using reusable components. This makes it easier to build and maintain complex applications. GWT, on the other hand, uses a widget-based model, where the user interface is built using pre-defined widgets.
Code Sharing: Blazor allows for code sharing between the server and client, which means that developers can write code that can be executed on both sides. This can lead to more efficient development and maintenance. GWT does not provide this feature.
Tooling: Blazor has strong integration with Visual Studio and offers excellent tooling support. This includes features like debugging, autocompletion, and code refactoring. GWT also has integration with popular IDEs, but the tooling and support may not be as extensive as Blazor.
Maturity: Blazor is a newer framework compared to GWT and is still evolving. While it has gained popularity quickly, it may not have the same level of maturity and community support as GWT. GWT, on the other hand, has been around for a longer time and has a stable and mature ecosystem.

In Summary, Blazor and GWT differ in the languages they are based on, execution methods, component models, code sharing capabilities, tooling support, and maturity of the frameworks.