StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Blazor vs Vaadin

Blazor vs Vaadin

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vaadin
Vaadin
Stacks201
Followers279
Votes36
GitHub Stars631
Forks81
Blazor
Blazor
Stacks549
Followers724
Votes445

Blazor vs Vaadin: What are the differences?

Introduction

Blazor and Vaadin are two popular frameworks for building web applications. While they both offer similar functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will discuss six important differences between Blazor and Vaadin.

1. Server-side vs Client-side Rendering:

Blazor is a client-side web framework that allows developers to build interactive web UIs using C# and .NET. It runs in the browser using WebAssembly, which enables the execution of compiled code in a web environment. On the other hand, Vaadin is a server-side framework that follows a traditional approach of rendering UI components on the server and sending the HTML to the client.

2. Language and Technology Stack:

Blazor uses C# and .NET as its primary language and technology stack. It leverages the power of the .NET ecosystem, offering rich libraries and tools. Vaadin, on the other hand, uses Java as its primary language and relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It provides access to a wide range of Java libraries and frameworks.

3. Component-based Architecture:

Both Blazor and Vaadin follow a component-based architecture, which allows developers to build reusable UI components. However, the underlying implementation differs. Blazor components are written in C# and Razor syntax, while Vaadin components are written in Java and HTML.

4. Platform Independence:

Blazor offers platform independence, allowing developers to build web applications that can run on any modern browser. It is not tied to any specific operating system or platform. Vaadin, on the other hand, is built on the Java platform and requires the JVM to run. This means that Vaadin applications can run on any platform that supports Java.

5. Code Sharing and Reusability:

Blazor allows developers to share code between the client and server. This means that business logic and UI components can be reused on both sides, reducing duplication and simplifying maintenance. Vaadin, on the other hand, primarily focuses on server-side rendering and does not provide built-in support for code sharing between the client and server.

6. Learning Curve:

Blazor offers a smoother learning curve for developers who are already familiar with .NET and C#. Since it leverages the existing knowledge and tools of the .NET ecosystem, developers can quickly adapt to Blazor. Vaadin, on the other hand, requires knowledge of the Java language and ecosystem. Developers who are already proficient in Java may find it easier to learn Vaadin.

In Summary, Blazor and Vaadin differ in their rendering approach, language and technology stack, component architecture, platform independence, code sharing capabilities, and learning curve. Ultimately, the choice between the two frameworks depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vaadin
Vaadin
Blazor
Blazor

It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

-
Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming
Statistics
GitHub Stars
631
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
81
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
201
Stacks
549
Followers
279
Followers
724
Votes
36
Votes
445
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Java
  • 7
    Compatibility
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
Cons
  • 3
    Paid for more features
Pros
  • 63
    Uses C#
  • 49
    No need to learn separate language or technology
  • 42
    Supports making a single page application
  • 40
    Tight integration with .NET project
  • 38
    Uses .NET standard library
Cons
  • 4
    Initial load time
  • 2
    Hard to inject javascript
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET
C#
C#
WebAssembly
WebAssembly

What are some alternatives to Vaadin, Blazor?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase