Bootstrap vs Ember.js

Overview

Ember.js

Stacks1.6K

Followers865

Votes775

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks4.2K

Bootstrap

Stacks57.4K

Followers13.2K

Votes7.7K

GitHub Stars173.6K

Forks79.2K

Bootstrap vs Ember.js: What are the differences?

CSS Framework vs JavaScript Framework: Bootstrap is a CSS framework that focuses on front-end design and development, providing pre-designed components and layout utilities, while Ember.js is a JavaScript framework that aids in creating scalable single-page web applications with data binding and dynamic routing capabilities.
Styling vs Application Structure: Bootstrap primarily deals with the design and styling of a website, offering a ready-made grid system and reusable UI components like buttons, forms, and navigation bars, whereas Ember.js focuses on managing the structure and logic of web applications, handling data flow, routing, and handling user interactions.
Responsive Design vs Rich Internet Applications: Bootstrap specializes in building responsive websites that adapt to different screen sizes and devices, primarily focusing on the visual appearance and layout responsiveness, while Ember.js is geared towards building complex, rich internet applications that require robust data handling, templating, and client-server communications.
Ease of Use vs Learning Curve: Bootstrap is relatively easy to get started with, especially for designers and front-end developers who are familiar with HTML and CSS, as it provides ready-to-use components and styles, whereas Ember.js has a steeper learning curve, requiring knowledge of JavaScript and MVC architecture for effectively building dynamic web applications.
Customization vs Convention Over Configuration: Bootstrap allows for easy customization of styles and components by overriding default styles or utilizing themes, giving developers a high degree of control over the design of their websites, while Ember.js follows a convention over configuration approach, enforcing certain development patterns and guidelines for consistency and ease of development.
Community Support vs Performance Optimization: Bootstrap has a large community with extensive documentation, resources, and themes available for developers to leverage, making it easier to find solutions to common design problems, whereas Ember.js focuses more on optimizing performance and providing tools for building scalable applications, with a smaller but dedicated user base offering support and guidance.

In Summary, Bootstrap and Ember.js serve different purposes in web development, with Bootstrap focusing on front-end design and responsiveness, while Ember.js caters to building robust, data-driven web applications with complex functionalities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ember.js, Bootstrap

Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k

Comments

neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k

Comments

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js	Bootstrap
A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.	Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.
Creating web apps;Building UI	Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.6K	GitHub Stars 173.6K
GitHub Forks 4.2K	GitHub Forks 79.2K
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 57.4K
Followers 865	Followers 13.2K
Votes 775	Votes 7.7K
Pros & Cons
Pros 126 Elegant 97 Quick to develop 83 Great mvc 82 Great community 73 Great router Cons 2 Too much convention, too little configuration 2 Very little flexibility 1 Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps 1 Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful	Pros 1582 Responsiveness 1193 UI components 943 Consistent 779 Great docs 677 Flexible Cons 26 Javascript is tied to jquery 16 Every site uses the defaults 15 Grid system break points aren't ideal 14 Too much heavy decoration in default look 8 Verbose styles
Integrations
Node.js AngularJS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, Bootstrap?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Ember.js: What are the differences?

CSS Framework vs JavaScript Framework: Bootstrap is a CSS framework that focuses on front-end design and development, providing pre-designed components and layout utilities, while Ember.js is a JavaScript framework that aids in creating scalable single-page web applications with data binding and dynamic routing capabilities.
Styling vs Application Structure: Bootstrap primarily deals with the design and styling of a website, offering a ready-made grid system and reusable UI components like buttons, forms, and navigation bars, whereas Ember.js focuses on managing the structure and logic of web applications, handling data flow, routing, and handling user interactions.
Responsive Design vs Rich Internet Applications: Bootstrap specializes in building responsive websites that adapt to different screen sizes and devices, primarily focusing on the visual appearance and layout responsiveness, while Ember.js is geared towards building complex, rich internet applications that require robust data handling, templating, and client-server communications.
Ease of Use vs Learning Curve: Bootstrap is relatively easy to get started with, especially for designers and front-end developers who are familiar with HTML and CSS, as it provides ready-to-use components and styles, whereas Ember.js has a steeper learning curve, requiring knowledge of JavaScript and MVC architecture for effectively building dynamic web applications.
Customization vs Convention Over Configuration: Bootstrap allows for easy customization of styles and components by overriding default styles or utilizing themes, giving developers a high degree of control over the design of their websites, while Ember.js follows a convention over configuration approach, enforcing certain development patterns and guidelines for consistency and ease of development.
Community Support vs Performance Optimization: Bootstrap has a large community with extensive documentation, resources, and themes available for developers to leverage, making it easier to find solutions to common design problems, whereas Ember.js focuses more on optimizing performance and providing tools for building scalable applications, with a smaller but dedicated user base offering support and guidance.

Bootstrap vs Ember.js

Overview