Bootstrap vs jQWidgets

Overview

Bootstrap

Stacks57.4K

Followers13.2K

Votes7.7K

GitHub Stars173.6K

Forks79.2K

jQWidgets

Stacks14

Followers49

Votes1

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Bootstrap vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, Bootstrap and jQWidgets are popular frameworks used to create responsive and interactive web applications. Understanding their key differences can help developers choose the right tool for their projects.

Design Philosophy: Bootstrap follows a mobile-first design approach, prioritizing mobile device compatibility and responsive design out of the box. On the other hand, jQWidgets focuses more on providing a wide range of UI components and widgets for web applications without a specific emphasis on mobile-first design.
Feature Set: Bootstrap offers a comprehensive set of CSS-based components, such as grids, navigation bars, and typography, making it a robust choice for building modern websites. In contrast, jQWidgets is more focused on providing a variety of UI widgets like grids, charts, and trees, offering a rich selection of interactive elements for applications.
Customization: Bootstrap provides extensive customization options through its Sass variables and mixins, allowing developers to personalize the appearance and behavior of components. In comparison, jQWidgets offers less flexibility in customization but excels in providing ready-to-use UI components with extensive functionality and features.
Documentation and Support: Bootstrap has a large and active community of developers, which results in comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and resources to support users. On the other hand, jQWidgets provides dedicated support and assistance through forums, knowledge base articles, and direct customer support, ensuring users can resolve issues effectively.
Compatibility: Bootstrap is compatible with various front-end technologies, including JavaScript frameworks like jQuery and Angular, making it versatile for integrating with different systems. In contrast, jQWidgets is closely tied to jQuery, leveraging its power and compatibility but potentially limiting flexibility when working with other frameworks or libraries.
License Model: Bootstrap is an open-source framework released under the MIT license, allowing free usage and modification for personal and commercial projects. In contrast, jQWidgets follows a commercial license model, offering different pricing plans based on the number of developers and projects, making it more suitable for enterprise applications with dedicated support and updates.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Bootstrap and jQWidgets in design philosophy, feature set, customization, documentation, compatibility, and license model can help developers make informed decisions when choosing a framework for their web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, jQWidgets

Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k

Comments

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bootstrap

Tailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap	jQWidgets
Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.	It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.
Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.	Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars 173.6K	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks 79.2K	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 57.4K	Stacks 14
Followers 13.2K	Followers 49
Votes 7.7K	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 1582 Responsiveness 1193 UI components 943 Consistent 779 Great docs 677 Flexible Cons 26 Javascript is tied to jquery 16 Every site uses the defaults 15 Grid system break points aren't ideal 14 Too much heavy decoration in default look 8 Verbose styles	Pros 1 Awd Cons 1 Awdawdawd
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript React PHP jQuery Knockout Vue.js AngularJS ASP.NET HTML5 Spring MVC

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, jQWidgets?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

Design Philosophy: Bootstrap follows a mobile-first design approach, prioritizing mobile device compatibility and responsive design out of the box. On the other hand, jQWidgets focuses more on providing a wide range of UI components and widgets for web applications without a specific emphasis on mobile-first design.
Feature Set: Bootstrap offers a comprehensive set of CSS-based components, such as grids, navigation bars, and typography, making it a robust choice for building modern websites. In contrast, jQWidgets is more focused on providing a variety of UI widgets like grids, charts, and trees, offering a rich selection of interactive elements for applications.
Customization: Bootstrap provides extensive customization options through its Sass variables and mixins, allowing developers to personalize the appearance and behavior of components. In comparison, jQWidgets offers less flexibility in customization but excels in providing ready-to-use UI components with extensive functionality and features.
Documentation and Support: Bootstrap has a large and active community of developers, which results in comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and resources to support users. On the other hand, jQWidgets provides dedicated support and assistance through forums, knowledge base articles, and direct customer support, ensuring users can resolve issues effectively.
Compatibility: Bootstrap is compatible with various front-end technologies, including JavaScript frameworks like jQuery and Angular, making it versatile for integrating with different systems. In contrast, jQWidgets is closely tied to jQuery, leveraging its power and compatibility but potentially limiting flexibility when working with other frameworks or libraries.
License Model: Bootstrap is an open-source framework released under the MIT license, allowing free usage and modification for personal and commercial projects. In contrast, jQWidgets follows a commercial license model, offering different pricing plans based on the number of developers and projects, making it more suitable for enterprise applications with dedicated support and updates.

Bootstrap vs jQWidgets

Overview